Osun State Governor, Ademola Adeleke and his predecessor, Gboyega Oyetola will know their fate in the controversy trailing the outcome of the July 16, 2022 governorship election.
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had declared Adeleke of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) winner of the poll, saying he polled 403,371 votes to sack Oyetola who was the then incumbent with 375,027.
Oyetola and his party – the All Progressives Congress (APC) had alleged irregularities in the polls and challenged Adeleke’s victory in the Election Petitions Tribunal.
Respite came for the former governor on January 27, 2023, as Justice Tertse Kume who gave the majority judgement upturned Adeleke’s victory and declared Oyetola the winner of the poll.
Justice Kume held that Oyetola scored the majority lawful votes of 314,931 against Adeleke’s 290,266.
Not satisfied with the judgement Displeased, Adeleke and the PDP headed to the Court of Appeal, which on March 24 nullified the tribunal judgment and returned Adeleke as the winner.
Aggrieved with the Appeal Court verdict, Oyetola and the PDP headed for the Supreme Court, which held the matter on Monday and fixed judgment for today (Tuesday).
On Monday, the parties adopted their briefs and addressed the court after which the panel announced Tuesday for judgment.
The Presidential Election Petition Court(PEPC) sitting in Abuja has adjourned till Wednesday, further pre-hearing session on the petition of the Labour Party and its candidate, Peter Obi, and Action Peoples Party(APP) challenging Senator Ahmed Tinubu of the All Progressive Congress’ emergence as president-elect. The court asked the parties in the matter to go and harmonize their processes to determine the issues to be raised and object and come back Wednesday (10th May).
Justice Haruna Tsammani led a five-member panel that also adjourned the case of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, and its candidate, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar till Tuesday.
Among those in court to witness the proceedings were the presidential candidate of the LP, Mr Peter Obi.
Also in court to witness the proceeding was the Governor of Plateau State Simon Lalong who represented his party, the All Progressives Congress, APC.
The court adjourned till Wednesday after parties in the matter informed the court that they have filed their answers to the questions posed by the petitioner.
The 2023 Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) has revealed identities of it’s five-member panel of Justices of the Court of Appeal that will hear and determine all petitions against Bola Ahmed Tinubu of the All Progressive Congress (APC).
The panel will be headed by the Presiding Justice (PJ) of the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal, Justice Haruna Tsammani, while other members of the panel are; Justice Stephen Adah (PJ Asaba Division), Justice Minsurat Bolaji-Yusuf (Asaba Division), Justice Boluokuromo Ugo (Kano Division), as well as Justice Abba Mohammed (Ibadan Division).
Meanwhile, Mr Peter Obi of the Labour Party(LP) on Monday stormed the Presidential Election Petition Court, PEPC, sitting at the Court of Appeal in Abuja.
Obi and his party are challenging the declaration of Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress, APC, as winner of the presidential election that held on February 25.
The former Governor of Anambra state is insistent that he was the clear winner of the election and among other things, is seeking the withdrawal of the Certificate of Return that was issued to Tinubu.
Also, Obi maintains that Tinubu was not even qualified to contest the election in view of his previous indictment and forfeiture of funds in a drug related case in the United States of America.
In his prayers, he equally posited that Tinubu was not duly elected with majority of valid votes cast at the election, insisting that he failed to win the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, as required by the Constitution.
File photo of Adeboyega Oyetola and Ademola Adeleke
The Apex Court fixed the date for the judgment after taking arguments from the parties involved in the matter.
The Supreme Court will on Tuesday, May 9, give judgment and lay to rest the disputed July 16, 2022 Governorship election in Osun State.
Adegboyega Oyetola of the All Progressives Congress (APC is challenging the election of the incumbent Governor Ademola Nurudeen Adeleke of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).
Recall that the Court of Appeal in Abuja had on Friday, March 24, vacated the tribunal judgment that nullified the election of Gov. Ademola Adeleke of Osun State.
The appellate court, in a unanimous decision by a three-member panel of Justices, held that the appeal Adeleke lodged to challenge his sack by the Osun State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal, was meritorious.
Aside from setting aside the judgment of the tribunal, the court, in its lead judgment that was delivered by Justice Mohammed Lawal, awarded N500, 000 cost against the All Progressive Congress, APC, and its candidate, Gboyega Oyetola.
Not satisfied with the decision of the appellate court, Oyetola headed to Supreme Court for exploration of more legal options.
Photo combo of Peter Obi, Bola Tinubu and Atiku Abubakar
Candidate of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, has approached the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) for an order to allow live broadcast of the day-to-day proceedings regarding his petition.
Specifically, Atiku and his party are praying the court for “An order directing the Court’s Registry and the parties on modalities for admission of Media Practitioners and their Equipment into the courtroom.”
The application filed on their behalf by their team of lawyers led by Chief Chris Uche, SAN, is predicated amongst other grounds that: The matter before the Honourable Court is a dispute over the outcome of the Presidential Election held on 25th February 2023, a matter of national concern and public interest, involving citizens and voters in the 36 States of the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, who voted and participated in the said election; and the International Community as regards the workings of Nigeria’s Electoral Process”.
According to Atiku, being a unique electoral dispute with a peculiar constitutional dimension, it is a matter of public interest, whereof millions of Nigerian citizens and voters are stakeholders with a constitutional right to get access to the proceedings.
“An integral part of the constitutional duty of the Court is to hold proceedings in public; it is a discretion to allow public access to proceedings either physically or by electronic means.
“With the huge and tremendous technological advances and developments in Nigeria and beyond, including the current trend by this Honourable Court towards embracing electronic procedures, virtual hearing and electronic filing, a departure from the rules to allow a regulated televising of the proceedings in this matter is in consonance with the maxim that justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done.
“Televising court proceedings is not alien to this Honourable Court, and will enhance public confidence,” Atiku said.
The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), had in its communique at the end of its National Executive Committee meeting in Birnin Kebbi on March 23, called on the judiciary to allow live broadcast of court hearings on election petitions, particularly the presidential election cases.
Also, a group, under the aegis of Leaders of Thoughts and Legal Icons, had supported the initiative. To this end, the group had invited Nigerians to sign up on an appeal on commonbliceng, a non-partisan online platform, in support of the initiative.
Similarly, leading human rights lawyer, Femi Falana and key leaders of thought of Project Nigeria Movement (PNM), a body of eminent leaders of thought in the country, led by foremost constitutional lawyer, Prof Ben Nwabueze, have backed calls for live broadcast of election petition trials.
Similarly, former Director General of Nigeria Television Authority and communications scholar, Prof Tonnie Iredia, had in an incisive published paper called for televising election petition proceedings in Nigeria in the interest of national concern and public interest, as envisaged by the 1999 Constitution (As Amended).
No date has been fixed for hearing in the fresh application.
