Tag: PDP crisis

  • Turaki Rejects Ibadan Judgment, Vows Legal Battle as Opposing Faction Claims Victory

    Turaki Rejects Ibadan Judgment, Vows Legal Battle as Opposing Faction Claims Victory

    The Chairman of the embattled faction of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Tanimu Turaki (SAN), has furiously rejected Friday’s judgment of the Federal High Court sitting in Ibadan, describing it as perverse, politically motivated and a dangerous assault on internal party democracy.

    In a strongly worded statement, Turaki said the ruling nullifying the party’s National Convention of Nov. 15 and Nov. 16, 2025, was a clear travesty of justice that failed to reflect the facts, evidence and binding legal authorities presented before the court.

    He accused the court of overreaching its jurisdiction, insisting that the conduct of the convention fell squarely within the internal affairs of the party and was carried out in substantial compliance with the PDP Constitution and the Electoral Act.

    “This judgment represents a disturbing departure from settled judicial principles. It amounts to judicial endorsement of impunity and rewards those who chose chaos, disobedience and manipulation over lawful party processes,” Turaki declared.

    The senior advocate further alleged that the opposing faction deliberately engaged in forum shopping, misleading the court and weaponising the judiciary to seize control of the party through the back door after failing to gain legitimacy from PDP stakeholders.

    Turaki maintained that his leadership enjoys overwhelming support across the states and warned that the judgment, if allowed to stand, would set a dangerous precedent capable of destabilising political parties nationwide.

    “We will not surrender the PDP to impostors masquerading under court orders obtained through deception. Our legal team has been instructed to immediately challenge this judgment at the appellate court,” he said.

    He urged PDP members loyal to his leadership to remain resolute, describing the ruling as a temporary setback that would be overturned, while cautioning against any attempt by the opposing faction to forcefully take over party structures.

    Reacting with equal force, the PDP National Caretaker Working Committee dismissed Turaki’s claims as baseless, reckless and contemptuous of the judiciary, insisting that the judgment had exposed what it described as the illegality underpinning the Turaki-led faction.

    In a statement issued in Abuja, Jungude Mohammed, National Publicity Secretary of the Caretaker Committee, said the ruling of the Federal High Court was a crushing blow to “years of impersonation, lawlessness and constitutional violations.”

    Mohammed said the court’s decision conclusively proved that the Ibadan convention was convened in blatant defiance of subsisting court orders and in total disregard of the PDP Constitution.

    “The era of self-help and illegal occupation of party offices is over. No amount of propaganda or legal gymnastics can overturn the truth established by the court,” Mohammed said.

    He accused the Turaki faction of deliberately undermining party unity while falsely presenting themselves as reformers.

    “Those who desecrated the PDP Constitution cannot now pretend to be victims. The judgment has stripped them bare and returned the party to the path of legality,” he added.

    Mohammed warned that any attempt by the Turaki-led group to continue parading as party leaders would amount to contempt of court, stressing that the PDP National Caretaker Committee, under Abdulrahman Mohammed, would not hesitate to enforce the ruling through lawful means.

    While reiterating the committee’s openness to reconciliation, Mohammed insisted that it must be based on submission to the rule of law, not intimidation or blackmail.

    “This judgment is final as far as legality is concerned. Anyone genuinely interested in the future of the PDP must first respect the law and the party constitution,” he said.

  • Presidency Slams Wike’s Actions, Reaffirms Fubara’s Authority in Rivers

    Presidency Slams Wike’s Actions, Reaffirms Fubara’s Authority in Rivers

    In what appears to be the clearest expression yet of official disapproval of his actions, the Presidency has reportedly cautioned the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, to desist from further actions perceived as undermining the administration of Governor Siminalayi Fubara of Rivers State.

    The directive was conveyed through the President’s Special Adviser on Media and Policy Implementation, Daniel Bwala, who spoke on behalf of the Presidency amid the lingering political crisis in Rivers State.

    According to Bwala, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu made it clear that Wike, a former governor of Rivers State, has been “adequately compensated” by his appointment into the Federal Executive Council and therefore should not pursue personal or political interests at the expense of national stability and governance.

    The Presidency emphasized that the ongoing tensions in Rivers State must not be allowed to disrupt governance or undermine democratic institutions, stressing that all parties involved should place the interests of Nigeria above individual political ambitions.

    Regarding the purported plan of the Rivers House of Assembly to impeach Gov. Fubara, Mr. Bwala advised the governor to take necessary legal steps to quash the move.

    In a significant political statement, the President also reaffirmed Governor Siminalayi Fubara as the undisputed leader of the ruling party in Rivers State, a declaration widely seen as a strong show of support for the embattled governor.

    Disclosing these details on a Channel TV programme titled “Hard Copy,” the Presidency warned that no individual or group should obstruct the governor from freely carrying out his constitutional responsibilities as the duly elected chief executive of the state.

    The Rivers State political crisis, which has been marked by a power struggle between Wike and his former political ally, Fubara, has generated widespread concern within political circles and among the public.

    Analysts believe the Presidency’s intervention signals a decisive move to de-escalate the conflict and reinforce party discipline and constitutional order.

    Observers also interpret the President’s remarks as a reminder to political actors that federal appointments are not licenses to interfere in state governance, particularly where such actions threaten political stability.

    As tensions persist, stakeholders are calling for reconciliation, restraint, and respect for democratic norms to ensure peace and effective governance in Rivers State.