Tag: Value Added Tax

  • Tinubu Tax Reform Bills: Buba Galadima Opens a Can of Warms

    Tinubu Tax Reform Bills: Buba Galadima Opens a Can of Warms

    • Says none of 36 state governors made input to the bills except Gov Sannwo-Olu of Lagos State and the Chairman of the Reform Committee, Taiwo Oyedele;
    • Both gentlemen drafted the Reform Bills;
    • Bills deliberately designed to favour Lagos and Ogun states;
    • Some members of the Committee have disowned the Bills.

    Engr. Galadima, an Elder statesman and stalwart of the NNPP says the Bills, in their present format have to be rejected because the process leading to its formulation lacks transparency.

    He said the bill is a contraption of Mr. Taiwo Oyedele, the Chairman of the tax reform committee and Mr. Babajide Sanwo-Olu, the Lagos State Governor, contending, the two of them practically wrote the bills before handing them over to President Tinubu.

    Engr. Galadima said that in fact, all members of the committee from other parts of the country have already disowned the bills because they discovered that the final bill did not reflect the contributions submitted by the various sub-committees.

    Engr. Galadima who spoke as a guest of This Day Live, a programme on Arise TV. chided Dr. Reuben Abati whom he accused of deploying divisive narratives that had the tendency to pit regions of the country against each other.

    Galadima also stressed that the bills will never be allowed to scale through in their present format because of the approach of President Tinubu and his recent statement of ‘no going back.”

    He also accused the committee and President Tinubu of over reaching themselves by veering into the subject of derivation or revenue sharing, which is a constitutional issue.

    Contributing to the subject, Professor David Aworawo of the University of Lagos disagreed with the committee on several aspects of the Bill.

    He referred to a provision in the Bill which stated that by 2030 funding to the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFUND) shall cease and be diverted to the National Education Loan Fund (NELFUND), saying that provision alone goes to show that the committee lacked adequate knowledge of contemporary Nigeria.

    Contending, Prof Aworawo explained that most modern physical structures in tertiary institutions in Nigeria are funded by TETFUND, asking, “If you phase out TETFUND and utilise the money as loans to students, where will they stay to receive the lectures?”

    Reacting to the position of Mr. Galadima, Taiwo Oyedele confirmed that members of the committee only met with the Governor of Lagos, who ended being the only governor that made input to the bills.

    He said even though the committee met with Mr. Uba Sani, the Governor of Kaduna state, they did not succeed in discussing the subject matter of the tax reform bills.

    He said that the committee did not succeed in having any engagement with the remaining 35 state governors.

    Mr. Oyedele said that at inception, the committee had planned to meet with a governor from each of the six geo-political zones of the country but succeeded in meeting with the Lagos state governor alone.

  • VAT, vassal states and restructuring (2)

    VAT, vassal states and restructuring (2)

    THERE are too many things wrong with the regime of Nigeria’s president, Alhaji Bola Ahmed Tinubu. For 18 months since the advent of the administration, it has been a case of stumbling from one problem to the other. The tragedy is that almost all the challenges that this regime has been grappling with were self-inflicted. It started off with an ill-conceived petrol subsidy removal, and it followed that almost immediately with allowing the national currency, the Naira, to be floated.

    Both policies turned out to be disastrous because the so-called petrol subsidy payment persisted in an opaque manner, and subsidizing the Naira did abate. Recently, the state oil corporation, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) insisted that it will continue to import petroleum products in spite of the existence of a domestic producer, Dangote Refinery and Petrochemical Company, Lagos, which said that it has the capacity to satisfy domestic consumption for petroleum products. Dangote’s 650,000 barrels of crude oil per day production should on full stream produce 50 million litres of petrol and 15 million litres of diesel per day.

    Experts estimate that petrol consumption in Nigeria should not exceed 35 million litres per day. But corruption puts it much higher, sometimes for as high as 70 million litres per day. This outrageous figure is not strange because Nigeria is widely acknowledged as a crime scene – a country hurting in the hands of its supposed care-givers. Private importers who work at the behest of collaborators inside the government have been known to ‘import’ shiploads of petroleum products without the ships being sited anywhere near the country’s territorial waters, not to talk of discharging any products. But such ‘importers’ file claims with excellent shipping documents, and collect hundreds of millions of dollars from the public treasury. NNPCL does the same.

    Then a cartel hijacks the little litres of petrol that were in truth brought in, ferrying such to neighbouring countries in 33000-litre trucks and in broad daylight where they make a kill. Nigeria has clearly delineated borders with its neighbours. We have all manner of tax-payer paid government officials at those borders. But the trade booms. Currently, an investigative reporter has been reporting on the daily massive smuggling of 50kg bags of rice into the country with the active involvement of immigration top shots. He has been doing so with video evidence. Last week the journalist reported that the leader of the smugglers was accorded a red carpet reception at the Abuja headquarters of the Nigeria Immigration Service. His reports have not been disputed and nothing has happened to the economic saboteurs.

    Back to the issue at hand. Alhaji Tinubu takes responsibility for his misadventures on petrol and Naira. Almost two years since his hare-brained twin policies, market forces are yet to fully determine the prices of petroleum products and the price of the Naira. Whilst the NNPCL moderates the prices of petroleum products especially petrol by importing and fixing different pump head prices for different parts of the country, the Central Bank defends the Naira through regular sales of the United States dollars to the bureaux de change, and through the aggressive mopping up of  Naira in circulation. The policies are obviously not working. The price of petrol at over N1000/litre is not sustainable. It has ruined the economy and will inflict more damage with the regime’s insistence that it will stay the course. Nigerian families are worse off. Bloomberg, an American news organization reported last week that about two -third of Nigerian households can barely manage to feed once a day. And the quality of the meal is suspect. Their report was drawn from the latest statistics from the Nigeria’s National Bureau of Statistics (NBS).

    The irony right now is that there are claims that the country is turning the corner, and that good days are on the horizon. Tinubu says so. The central bank governor says the same. Finance minister who is also the coordinating minister for the economy sees the same signs of economic recovery. Even the national security adviser, yes the NSA, who should have his hands full with widespread insecurity pervading the land, parrots the same message of visible economic turn around. But they are the only people who see economic recovery on the horizon. And they all share one thing in common – they all binge on the public treasury. I wager that none of them had been to a gas station to buy either petrol for the government SUVs (armour- plated and bomb-resistant brands) that they are driven in or to purchase diesel to fire government – owned electricity generators in their residences which also are built and tastefully furnished with taxpayers money.

    It is not strange, therefore, that they are separated from reality and the daily grind of the majority of Nigerians. The case of the NSA is particularly painful and pathetic. Daily, he joins the security agencies including the secret police otherwise called the Directorate of State Services (DSS), the regular Police, the Civil Defence Corps, the Armed Forces, among others, to run political commentaries on the state of the country. In place of combating insecurity, what the NSA does is to warn non-state agents terrorizing Nigeria to know that Tinubu is not known to lose any battle. Is he for real? The man cannot be, and should not be, a national security adviser even in a banana republic. What our rulers are doing is beyond talking up the economy, they are deliberately deceiving Nigerians. Any sign of economic recovery must show in the living standards and living conditions of the people. Today’s reality is that about 20 million children are out of school and about 150 million Nigerians are grappling with dimensional poverty. Of course, our country has been the poverty capital of the world since 2019.

    If nothing good is happening in the country, and nothing good has really happened in Nigeria in the last 18 months, it is down to the fact that the majority of Nigerians do not trust the regime headed by Tinubu. He assumed office about two years ago with a fractured mandate. And since then he has proceeded to surround himself with people like himself (people with real and perceived blemishes), and those who speak and dress like him. He is enmeshed in policy somersaults. At every turn he puts the cart before the horse. His regime is wobbly, fumbling and floundering. And because the regime perceives itself as fragile and unstable and unsure in spite of its attempt at blustering, it now sees treason in every spoken word by non-regime supporters, in every action and inaction, and in every news story and editorial opinions of some publications. The point is that the more this regime sees enemies everywhere, the more it will retreat to itself, and the more eventually it will begin to crack down on imaginary detractors. Already, for the diminishing clan of regime choristers, anybody who opposes where Tinubu is taking the country is treated as not being patriotic. To their warped minds they equate patriotism with love for a serially bungling administration. They are not capable of putting country before party or ethnic affiliations or fleeting benefits from the rulers.

    Expectedly, the gulf between the people and the regime is widening and it is beginning to play out. It’s manifesting in the new tax bills before our supine national assembly. For a start, the tax bills are one year late in coming. It is the style of the regime – to make policy statements without even a draft of the working papers. It did the same thing with the student loans scheme and conditional cash transfer to the poor of the poor in the country, to mention but two. Often its pronouncements bear no relationship with reality. The administration at Inception said it would reduce dependence on loans to run the government. That avowal may have informed what was thought to be the urgency it would attach to the tax bills. It failed. Now that the regime has roused itself from slumber, ‘enemies’ have laid ambush for the bills.

    Except for a segment of the Yoruba nation, every other nation in Nigeria is now increasingly inclined to live like “onye ndiro gbara ugburu gburu n’eche ndu ya nche mgbenile” or eternal vigilance is the price for liberty. With the antecedents of Tinubu other component-nations of the country will only treat his tax bills with levity to their eternal damnation. The first thing that should set the alarm bells ringing is the composition of the team that crafted and superintended the making of the bills. They look like Tinubu. They bear similar names like his. They dress and speak like him. So why should he and his parochial team be trusted to be altruistic in the work they have done? Other nations within Nigeria have a right to suspect these tax bills because, so far, Tinubu has demonstrated that he is an ethnic bigot.

    It came as  no surprise, therefore, that a section of the north of Nigeria was the first to scream that the tax bills were not the ‘Hail Mary’ that the regime claimed that they were. Senator Ali Ndume cried foul and vowed that the bills would be killed in the national assembly. Though a member, Ndume must be mistaken if he believes that the country still has a parliament worthy of that name. This assembly is an extension of the Executive arm. I didn’t say so, the leadership of the assembly said so from the get-go. And they have not disappointed. Indeed the national assembly members commenced consideration of the money bills last year by first singing the personal anthem of Tinubu “On your mandate we shall stand…” Anybody who expected any better from such buffoons who masquerade as lawmakers must be living in a fool’s paradise. Then the national economic council (NEC) composed of the vice president  and governors advised Tinubu to withdraw the bills to allow further stakeholders’ consultations. Tinubu promptly and derisively dismissed them. The controversy and the insistence of the president to forge ahead have alerted the other nations. The south east governors forum, for instance, was reported to have set up an expert team to review the bills for possible boobytraps.

    The one bill in the basket of bills that has attracted much attention was the value added tax (VAT). Some experts and indeed non-experts are concerned that the president and his kinsmen tax team are up to some mischief. They have honed in on two words concerning the VAT bill – Attribution and Derivation – which of them should enjoy preeminence. Among other people, one writer attempted to highlight where the bodies were buried in the VAT bill. We will reproduce part of his exertion. The person who identified himself as Chris Okafor on WhatsApp wrote: “.. the truth is (that) tax experts filled with Tinubu’s apologists (and 90% of Nigerians of Yoruba extraction) worked on the bill and hid so much into the bill which will put Lagos and Ogun (states) into economic advantage slightly short of extortion of other states” of Nigeria. He argued that from the present structure of the VAT bill, 60% of the takings will go to the state of collection. His grouse was that a disproportionate amount of VAT proceeds will go to the states hosting the head offices of companies that produce ‘vatable’ goods and services even when the same goods and services were patronized in other states of the country. He illustrated with some companies saying, for instance, that if VAT of N500 million was collected from a branch of a company in one state, 60% of the collection under the proposed principle of derivation would go to the state hosting the headquarters of that company and not in the state where the product/service was consumed.

    There’s little doubt that an arrangement such as illustrated above will make some areas of the country vassal states. It will sow seeds of discord and discontent. VAT is a sales tax and so components of the federating units of the country should be legally empowered to collect and use consumption tax. Another allegation that should be concerning is the yet to be verified claim that there’s a provision in one of the tax bills that would empower the federal government to take a certain percentage of funds that drop into personal and corporate bank accounts. We align with the national economic council that more time should be allowed for further scrutiny of these tax bills. We do not presently have a national assembly, and the claim by the Executive that the assembly should be allowed to scrutinize the bills on our behalf is gratuitous. Our so-called representatives and senators are preoccupied looking out for themselves.

    It’s accepted that we operate an ugly and difficult to decipher federal system of government, but 25 years and counting, we must summon the will to begin to put processes and structures in place to approximate a federation. The ruling elite has a bounden duty to work harder to smoothen the rough edges which combined forces could lead to the implosion of Nigeria. They should see the Nigerian project as bigger than their personal and/or regional interests. And if this perceived skewed VAT distribution is part of the ongoing restructuring in the image and likeness of Tinubu, it may not bode well for this country that for all intents and purposes is tottering on the edge of the cliff. The allegation that bank deposits may be taxed by the government could just prove to be the trigger for national cataclysm. Who wants this?

    *Concluded.

    UGO ONUOHA Was the Managing Director/Editor-in-Chief, Champion Newspapers Limited

  • VAT, vassal states and restructuring [1]

    VAT, vassal states and restructuring [1]

    “Soso onye nzuzu bu onye na-amagh mgbe ekechara nku ukwa”. Only a fool would not know when the bazaar is over. I used to have a friend. He is now late. His name was Jimanze Alowes. He said he was Igbo from Amaigbo in Imo state. But his name did not sound Igbo. However, he spoke impeccable Igbo, if there was any such thing. He also spoke impeccable English, if there was any such thing also. He was brilliant, and articulate. He was certainly street wise. In hindsight, he probably knew that longevity of life was not a gift to him from his creator. He understood this country, and he wanted things done, and done fast to his personal upliftment.

    On occasions when we sat down to discuss and bemoan the challenges that the country threw on the path of youngsters, he would sit in disturbing and disconcerting silence. He left you with the impression that he was not paying attention. But when you expressed frustration that he was not listening he would quietly but intently look you in the eyes, and then say something to the effect that bells were being rung every morning and those with trained ears knew where to go to grab their share of the looting that was going on in the country. Here, I am referencing conversations that took place almost 30 years ago.

    In another vein, Nigeria is like the Biblical story of the 10 Virgins as recorded in the Gospel of St. Matthew chapter 25 from verse 1 and following. “Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom. And five of them were wise, and five were foolish”. You will wonder about the relevance of this illustration to the topic above and the broad theme of the subject under discussion. The five virgins who had oil in their lamps represented real Nigerians, while the five foolish virgins who profess to be Nigerians are only outwardly so, doing so just with their lips. In reality they are outsiders who have been left, or who allowed themselves to be left, with the short end of the stick. The Igbo in Nigeria may just be the five foolish virgins. This is not an effort at self deprecation.

    We know it as a fact that some Nigerians have been mouthing the urgent imperatives of restructuring the country. But some elements in the Igbo nation are campaigning for an excision from this country, and the creation of a new country to be called Biafra. This new country was actually first created on May 30, 1967 and became defunct in January 1970. So, Biafra was a country that lived for about three years. The point to note is that while some Nigerians are still clamouring for restructuring, the smart ones are at work doing the deed of reshaping the country. This started with the advent of the All Progressives Congress (APC) political party with Maj.-General (rtd) Muhammadu Buhari in government in 2015. Buhari (2015-2023) was a bad ruler. And he was inept in his attempt to restructure Nigeria to benefit Muslims and the northern parts of the country.

    Nonetheless, he tried his best. He populated his regime with people who worshiped like him. He moved every movable government institution to areas which he considered to be part of the the greater north. He borrowed offshore funds in the name of all Nigerians but concentrated on the citing of public facilities and infrastructure in the north. Buhari’s regime went into overdrive to explore for crude oil in parts of the north. He spared no expense to make this a reality. Where the money for the Buhari venture was not borrowed, it came from the resources from other parts of the country. He commenced building pipelines from the Niger Delta region to the north, and further afield to neighbouring Niger Republic, his alleged ancestral home, to pipe natural gas to yet to be built power stations, and for storage.

    Buhari was no fool. He had a clear picture of Nigeria’s tomorrow. He knew that what we were doing, and are still doing, in this country was not sustainable. He worked very hard to ensure that the north or part of the north was ready for the inevitable. It was this reasoning that informed his borrowing billions of dollars from the Chinese to construct standard gauge rail tracks from the north to the heart of Niger Republic, his other home country. Nigeria will repay the debt but will only get crumbs from the designated projects. The eastern axis of the country will get a narrow rail gauge. Buhari was an intentional man but because he was inept at whatever he did, he failed to accomplish his parochial vision of restructuring Nigeria. He failed himself. He failed his people. But he left a template for his successor. And the new man is adept at devious schemes.

    The new ruler, Alhaji Bola Ahmed Tinubu, is focused and determined to restructure Nigeria to benefit his south west people. And he is not shy about it. He has already said that those expecting restructuring along the lines he had been campaigning for in the past three decades will have to wait in vain. He said that restructuring of the country has been moving apace since he was made president about 18 months ago. And Tinubu’s new definition of political and economic restructuring of Nigeria included stuffing the institutions of the federal government with people who speak and dress like him. He has captured the commanding heights of the security sector and gifted the same to his acolytes who mostly are members of his ethnic group. The same goes for revenue generating agencies of the federation. His presidency recently attempted to dismiss the allegations of his crass nepotism but ended up compounding the situation. The graphics it published actually confirmed the allegations and went further to show that two geo-political zones of the country – the south south and south east – were completely left in the cold in the headship of the security agencies.

    In like manner one of the road infrastructure that was repaired and reconstructed to enviable standard soon after Tinubu took office was the Third Mainland Bridge in the economic capital of the Yoruba nation. If you want to fully appreciate the magnitude of the work done there, drive through it at night. I have driven through many bridges in Nigeria, some of them at night, and I can say with emphasis that none compares with the ‘new’ Third Mainland Bridge. When I drove through that bridge at night soon after the reconstruction was completed, the word restructuring immediately flashed through my mind. To think that Buhari had actually worked on the same bridge some months earlier. Of course, he did it casually since it was not in his zone. Meanwhile, two massive road projects are currently ongoing. The Lagos -Calabar Coastal Super Highway and the Badagry-Sokoto Desert Highway. Both have some things in common: they will cost Nigerian taxpayers trillions of Naira; they will take-off from Lagos, the economic capital of Yoruba land; and, they will pass through all or almost all Yoruba states. The contracts for these super highways have been awarded to one contractor, Hitech Construction Company, whose owner is alleged to be a long-standing business partner of the president. If there were public tenders and competitive biddings for the projects such information is not in the public domain. And there’s no evidence that any environmental impact assessments were conducted ahead of awarding the contracts. What we know is that the right of passage for the Lagos -Calabar road has been changed multiple times. The same for the width of the road. It has shrunk from 10-lanes to six lanes but the cost has not come down. The cost, if ever it will be delivered, will increase beyond the N15 trillion price tag going by the way the Nigerian government operates. It’s worse for these road contracts because the processes are opaque. They are in-your-face contracts.

    As our rulers, first Buhari and now Tinubu, restructure Nigeria in their own image and in their own likeness through the accumulation of debts, many Nigerians including succeeding generations will be saddled with paying debts that had not been used to benefit them. The Igbo of the south east will be the worst hit. The other day it was reported that if Nigerians share the current quantum of the country’s public debt, each citizen will have to pay about N620,000, which is eight times the prevailing minimum wage, to defray the debt. Where’s the equity in this, given that the loans that had been incurred had not been used to the benefits of all parts of the country. Indeed, not too long ago some persons from the Igbo nation said they intended to approach appropriate international courts and tribunals to ensure that Ndigbo would not be obligated to pay back offshore loans that were procured by the federal government but were not used for their (Igbo) benefit.

    *In our next intervention we will explore how Tinubu and his economic witch doctors are scheming to aggrandise a section of the country to the eternal damnation of the rest through their so-called tax reforms. And why there should be a last ditch battle to stop them. That should be a patriotic duty.

    The New Third Mainland Bridge, Lagos

    Ugo Onuoha, Veteran Journalist, was the Managing Director, Editor-in-Chief, Champion Newspapers Limited

  • FG confirms plans to raise VAT to 15%, limits increase to luxury goods

    FG confirms plans to raise VAT to 15%, limits increase to luxury goods

    The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Mr. Wale Edun, has confirmed that the federal government plans to raise Value Added Tax (VAT) to 15%, but clarified that the increase would primarily affect luxury goods.

    Speaking at an investor meeting during the ongoing IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings in Washington DC, Mr. Edun explained that a bill currently before the National Assembly aims to gradually raise VAT on luxury goods, while essential items consumed by poorer and vulnerable Nigerians would remain exempt from VAT or attract a zero rate.

    “In terms of VAT, President Bola Tinubu’s commitment is that while implementing difficult and wide-ranging but necessary reforms, the poorest and most vulnerable will be protected,” Edun said. “So, the Bills going through the National Assembly in terms of VAT will raise VAT for the wealthy on luxury goods, while at the same time exempting or applying a zero rate to essentials that the poor and average citizens purchase.”

    He added that the list of essential goods exempted from VAT will be made available to the public in due course.

    Mr. Edun also expressed optimism regarding Nigeria’s oil sector, noting that improved security in oil-producing regions and new investments, particularly by Total and ExxonMobil, would result in increased oil production and boost foreign exchange inflows.

    Addressing the issue of fuel subsidy removal, Edun disclosed that while subsidy reform was announced earlier, the full implementation only took effect last month. He emphasized that the savings from the removal would start to have a more significant impact on the economy going forward.

    In response to a question about the possibility of Nigeria entering an IMF program, Mr. Edun revealed that the Tinubu administration went ahead with the issuance of Domestic Dollar Bonds despite advice from the IMF against such a move.

    ReplyForwardAdd reaction
  • FG Set to jack up Value Added Tax

    FG Set to jack up Value Added Tax

    The federal government has put forward a proposal to raise the Value Added Tax (VAT) from 7.5% to 10%. 

    This proposal is encapsulated in an executive bill currently under consideration by the National Assembly. 

    Reports indicate that the government plans to implement further increments, targeting a VAT of 12.5% by 2026, increasing to 15% starting in 2030. 

    The legislative document outlines a gradual increase in VAT rates across several assessment years. 

    Earlier discussions around VAT included insights from Taiwo Oyedele, chairman of the presidential committee on fiscal policy and tax reforms, who previously stated the necessity for a VAT increase.

     In contrast, Finance Minister Wale Edun had clarified that the VAT rate had not yet been modified.

    In addition to the VAT hike, the bill also suggests a reduction in the Corporate Income Tax (CIT) from 30% to 27.5% by 2025, with a further decrease to 25% in 2026. 

    Small businesses with annual turnovers below ₦20 million will not be subject to this tax. 

    The document further stipulates that companies falling under certain categories with an effective tax rate below 15% must pay an additional tax to meet that minimum threshold. 

    This measure aims to bolster compliance among larger corporations.

    Furthermore, the federal government recently published new withholding tax regulations, set to take effect on January 1, 2025, as part of its ongoing tax reform agenda.

     These proposed changes reflect the government’s intention to adapt the taxation framework to stimulate economic activity while managing fiscal responsibilities.

  • Q1 2023: FG rakes in N709.59bn VAT

    Nigeria’s aggregate Value Added Tax (VAT) for Q1 2023 has been reported at N709.59 billion, the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), has said. 

    According to the NBS Value Added Tax report for Q1, 2023, a growth rate of 1.75 percent on a quarter-on-quarter basis from N697.38 billion in Q4 2022.

    Local payments recorded were N436.10 billion, Foreign VAT payments were N151.13 billion, while import VAT contributed N122.37 billion in Q1 2023.

    On a quarter-on-quarter basis, the activities of households as employers, undifferentiated goods- and services producing activities of households for own use recorded the highest growth rate with 349.86%, followed by construction with 95.64%.

    On the other hand, the report noted that activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies had the lowest growth rate with–53.54%, followed by real estate activities with– 47.01%.

    In terms of sectoral contributions, the top three largest shares in Q1 2023 were manufacturing with 29.65%; information and communication with 19.29%; and mining & quarrying with 12.24%.

    The report said: “Conversely, activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies recorded the least share with 0.02%, followed by activities of households as employers, undifferentiated goods- and services-producing activities of households for own use with 0.03%; and water supply, sewerage, waste management, and remediation activities with 0.04%.”

    However, on a year-on-year basis, VAT collections in Q1 2023 increased by 20.56% from Q1 2022. 

    Similarly, aggregate Company Income Tax (CIT) for the first quarter of 2023 was reported at N469.01 billion, indicating a growth rate of -37.79% on a quarter-on-quarter basis from N753.88 billion in Q4 2022.

    According to the NBS, local payments received were N300.78 billion, while Foreign CIT payment contributed N168.23 billion in Q1 2023.

    On a quarter-on-quarter basis, the financial and insurance activities recorded the highest growth rate with 50.42 per cent, followed by construction with 42.32 per cent.

    “On the other hand, water supply, sewerage, waste management, and  activities had the lowest growth rate with – 69.38%, followed by other service activities with -60.13%. In terms of sectoral contributions, the top three largest shares in Q1 2023 were financial & insurance activities with 22.94%; manufacturing with 20.91%; and information and communication with 11.89%.

    “Conversely, the activities of households as employers, undifferentiated goods-and services-producing activities of households for own use recorded the least share with 0.01%, followed by water supply, sewerage, waste management, and remediation activities with 0.04%; and activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies with 0.12%.

    “However, on a year-on-year basis, CIT collections in Q1 2023 decreased by 14.96% from Q1 2022,” the NBS stated.