Tag: World Bank

  • World Bank Commends Tinubu’s Reform Drive, Calls Nigeria Global Reference Point

    World Bank Commends Tinubu’s Reform Drive, Calls Nigeria Global Reference Point

    The World Bank has commended President Bola Tinubu for his administration’s reform drive, describing Nigeria as a frequent global reference point for reform implementation and results.

    The bank’s Managing Director of Operations, Anna Bjerde, made the remarks on Tuesday while leading a World Bank Group delegation to meet the president at the State House in Abuja.

    Bjerde said the outcomes of Nigeria’s reforms over the past two years were widely discussed among global leaders, policymakers and investors, noting that the scale and pace of progress had drawn international attention.

    “Nigeria is a frequent example in my discussions around the world because the results achieved in two years are really commendable,” she said.

    She praised President Tinubu’s consistency in communicating the necessity of the reforms, adding that his steady leadership had helped sustain confidence despite the challenges associated with implementation.

    “Even when reform implementation is difficult, there is no turning back. You are staying the course,” Bjerde said.

    According to her, feedback from Nigeria’s private sector indicates that reform outcomes are becoming more visible, with improving investor sentiment and growing confidence in the policy direction of the government.

    On the forthcoming Country Partnership Framework, Bjerde said the new programme would be anchored on Nigeria’s development ambition of building a $1 trillion economy and achieving seven per cent economic growth. She stressed that job creation would be central to the partnership, particularly in light of Africa’s growing population and the urgency of employment opportunities for young people.

    She identified infrastructure investment, agricultural modernisation and improved access to finance for small and medium-sized enterprises as priority areas for collaboration, noting that Nigeria’s infrastructure spending remains low relative to its gross domestic product.

    Bjerde said this gap would require innovative public-private partnerships to unlock private capital and accelerate development. She disclosed that the World Bank’s public sector portfolio in Nigeria currently stands at about $17 billion, while its private-sector arm, the International Finance Corporation, invests approximately $5 billion annually in the country.

    She added that a new reform-linked budget support operation was being prepared, alongside expanded risk guarantee instruments designed to attract more private investment.

    “Your reforms and our budget support go hand in hand,” Bjerde said.

    Earlier, President Tinubu reaffirmed that his administration’s reform agenda was irreversible, declaring that Nigeria had “its hands on the plough” and would not retreat from the path of reform.

    “Since we went into this turn of reform, we are never going to look back,” the president said.

    Tinubu acknowledged that the reforms had been painful at the initial stage but said they were necessary to secure long-term economic stability and sustainable growth. He identified agriculture as a key pillar of the reform agenda, citing the establishment of mechanisation centres and Nigeria’s openness to World Bank support in the areas of improved seeds and productivity.

    The president also reiterated his commitment to transparency and accountability, describing the removal of fuel subsidies and the unification of the foreign exchange rate as difficult but unavoidable decisions.

    “The first reaction was high inflation, but it has come down dramatically. Now that it is stable, we can help investors,” Tinubu said.

    He urged the World Bank to accelerate innovative financing solutions, reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks and deepen support for skills development, while assuring the institution of Nigeria’s readiness for deeper engagement and a sustained partnership.

  • Tinubu Seeks NASS Approval for N1.77tn External Loan

    Tinubu Seeks NASS Approval for N1.77tn External Loan

    Nigeria sinks deeper into the debt trap as President Bola Tinubu submits a request to the National Assembly to approve additional N1.77trillion external borrowing. 

    A communication from the Presidency states the loan shall be used to cover and portion of the N9.7 trillion deficit plan for 2024.

    During Tuesday’s plenary, the Speaker read the president’s request, which also included the MTEF/FSP 2025-2027 and a bill to amend the National Social Investment Programme. 

    The proposed amendment aims to centralize the social register as the primary tool for welfare program implementation.

    Meanwhile, the Central Bank of Nigeria reported that Nigeria’s foreign debt servicing costs climbed by nearly 40% in the first nine months of 2024, amounting to $3.58 billion, up from $2.56 billion in 2023. 

    The country’s rising debt obligations are becoming more expensive, driven partly by fluctuating exchange rates, with January 2024 witnessing a dramatic surge in payments.

    In related developments, the debt of Nigeria’s 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory reached N11.47 trillion by June 2024, a 14.57% increase from December 2023. 

    The devaluation of the naira significantly contributed to the growth of the external debt, which rose to $4.89 billion, up from $4.61 billion. Domestic debt, however, saw a decline.

    The rising debt figures across the country reflect the growing fiscal pressures faced by both the federal and state governments, highlighting the need for sustainable economic management strategies.

  • Blaming the World Bank will not save our economy. Only us can

    Blaming the World Bank will not save our economy. Only us can

    I stumbled on an article by one Mr. Ahmed Sule ( FCA). It is so disappointing to read. It is nothing but a regurgitation of the same well-worn World Bank blame game. There was not one single alternative policy prescription other than the usual finger pointing and externalization of our problem. Expectedly, Mr. Sule latched on the article in which the World Bank gave its analysis of the Tinubu reform, as the bogey-man. He did not even make an attempt to provide his own counter-point to the World Bank. He failed to provide his position on the Tinubu economic agenda other than a listing of the pains it has inflicted on the populace. The president in his inaugural address stated clearly that his proposed economic reform agenda was going to be excruciatingly painful. He stated unequivocally that he was going to remove fuel subsidy and that he was going to float the currency. He did not trick the electorate. He also told the citizens to render their judgement on the performance of his reform policy with their votes in 2027. Mr. Sule in his social media post pretended as if our economic nightmare began with or was precipitated by the Tinubu regime. He had nothing to say about our profligate and obscene economic mismanagement dating back to the mid 1970s-early 80s during which we frittered away our oil windfall like drunken sailors on a pirate ship.

    World Bank bashing has been our default excuse for our collective failure since the 1986 IMF SAP debacle. We focused on SAP rather than its predicate. We never asked ourselves the hard question about what we did wrong with all the stupendous oil windfall that accrued to our country, and why we ended ended up prostrate in 1986 crawling on our belly to the World Bank and IMF for a bail out.

    The World Bank does not force itself on any country. Countries choose membership of the World Bank out of their free will. They usually approach the World Bank for low interest loan when they are totally out of luck and option, unable to access finance through the open financial market because they have mismanaged their credit worthiness. That was the position Nigeria found itself in 1986. Even after General Obasanjo was able to get a big chunk of our debt written off by the World Bank and other multilateral financial institutions we were indebted to, did we take advantage of that? No, we didn’t. Our politicians continued unabatedly to plunder our commonwealth and they still do.

    The Bible says the debtor is a slave to his creditor. So, when countries like Nigeria have run out of options and are forced by their desolate and desperate circumstances to crawl on their bellies for financial life wire, of course like the slave described in the Bible to their creditors, they are forced to go on a forced diet (conditionalities) in order to access the low interest loan and sometimes outright grants that the World Bank offers due to the “generosity” of the donor members.

    We need to know that donors do not donate their fund to the poor out of philanthropy and benevolence. Foreign aids are a tool of promoting national hegemonic advantage. There are no free lunches in international relations. U. S and Europe are not funding the Ukraine war necessarily because of their love for the Ukrainians. They are dropping billions of ammunition and weapons of death into Ukraine to fight Russia because it advances their geopolitical agenda against Russia. It also creates opportunity for the military industrial complex to dispose their unused weapons, to test new one and create jobs in their local economies. We will be wise to understand that our economic success lies with us doing the hard work of national building and advancing our economic interest in an amoral, survival of the fittest, rigged global economic system. We should never again put our country in the position in which external financial institutions dictate or have a veto on our economic policies. China can tell the World Bank to go to hell with its economic prescriptions. In fact China has created its own alternative to the World Bank. As we romance China, we would be wise to learn that China like the West before it is not a benevolent Father Christmas doling out free money for its Silk Road project.

    The phrase “ World Bank” is in fact a gross abuse, misuse and exaggeration of the financial muscle of the “ World Bank”. When the phrase World Bank was used at its founding it represented an extreme case of hubris. The capital asset of the “World Bank” is minuscule compared to those of global behemoths like the JP Morgan Chase, the China Bank of Industry, or the Bank of America. The world number one bank, China Industrial and Commercial Bank has total assets of $6.3 trillion. By comparison, the World Bank had just about $200 billion of assets under management. The World Bank would not rank among the top 50 banks in the world. In fact, there is a debate whether the term bank can truly be applied to the World Bank.

    There is therefore the tendency by failed economies and misinformed economic analysts to use the World Bank as the bogeyman, “the devil that made them do it”. We can externalize and blame the World Bank all we want, until we owe our economic misfortune and our culpability for it, we will only be spinning wheel stuck in the muck.

    Those who are condemning the Tinubu economic reform policy, which is neither perfect nor the silver bullet by any stretch of imagination, should go beyond finger-pointing and Monday morning quarterbacking. They should show us their alternative economy prescriptions. They should tell us how Nigeria succeeds economically by continuing with the failed policy of fuel subsidy and of artificially juicing and propping up our forex with high interest loan we could not afford so that the oil subsidy and forex mafias can prosper like bandits while mortgaging the future of generations of Nigerians yet unborn.

    You had oil subsidy mafia making billions of dollars by simply pushing unverifiable paper of millions of PMS import which never made it to our shores and the a huge portion of what ultimately makes it to the market is smuggled out of the country for a tidy windfall profit. You also had the forex mafia who bought forex at CBN subsidized rate purportedly to import capital equipment and essential commodities only to turn around to sell the same forex to their foot soldiers in the Bureau de Change at stupendous, huge profit margin. If that is not the definition of madness, please tell us what is.

    In his dream, Pharaoh is standing by the Nile when seven fat cows come up out of the river, followed by seven thin cows that eat the fat cows. In response Pharaoh stored away excess grains in the seven years of abundance to sustain his nation during the seven lean years that would follow. Our situation is the reverse of the Pharaoh situation. We failed over the decades, especially in the heady days of the high global oil market price to save money for the rainy day. Have we forgotten the commonwealth fund that was proposed by Sister Ngozi Okonjo Eweala during the President Jonathan regime to put away our excess oil revenue for the rainy day but rejected by the governors, or the hubris of young General Gowon who in the 70s declared that our country’s problem was not lack of money but how to spend it? Now we all have to endure the lean years we didn’t make provision for, in order for us to survive and be here when hopefully the years of abundance come back again.

    There are no guarantees that President Tinubu’s reform agenda will do the trick, but we are like an extremely critical patient who got into a bad auto accident after a night of excessive drinking and is now on the ER (emergency room) and the doctors are doing everything to safe his life. We have no option than to hold on tight for our dear life, bear the pain of the poking and the electric shock applied by the Defibrillators and hope and pray that it works.

    We must continue in our civic responsibility and obligation to hold the president accountable to live by example, the life of austerity his policy has forced Nigerians to live under. He should tackle and hold people accountable for past endemic corruption that is still rife under his administration. He should cut down on the profligacy that his administration has been accused of. He should rein in the unsustainably high cost of governance and the bloated bureaucracy that supports it. We are still waiting for the cabinet reshuffle to prune out dead wood and non-performing ministers and heads of agencies. He should prioritise competence over political patronage. He should constantly review the performance of his economic reforms agenda against the result in the real economy where the citizens live, and make adjustments when and where necessary. Those are the kind of debates we should be having not this constant whining and blaming the World Bank.

    The true victims of the Nigerian elites, who are the one on social media doing most of the complaining, are the poor masses who did not benefit a thing in the days of economic abundance and the Nigerian youths who have known nothing but tear, pain, sorrow, dashed hope and bleak future all of their life. Those of us who benefitted from the years of abundance should prioritize making the needed sacrifice so that our grandchildren can take over a country they have a chance to rebuild, than this constant complaining. If truth be told many of us cannot with a good conscience claim innocence in the plunder of our economy. Our generation’s obligation now is to make the last sacrifice to save this country for the future generations. Time is running out. We will never be able to hand over to the next generation, a country better than we met it. We are constantly looking back at the old western region era of Chief Awolowo with great nostalgia. That should tell us all we need to know about our abject failure.

    Externalizing the blame for our economic mismanagement to the World Bank is therefore, not a viable economic prescription.

    Adewale Alonge, PhD: Founder& President, Africa-Diaspora Partnership for Empowerment & Development (ADPED). www.adped.org

  • Shettima launches Nasarawa State Human Capital Development Plan

    Shettima launches Nasarawa State Human Capital Development Plan

    It is D-day in Nasarawa State today as the Vice President, His Excellency Senator Kashim Shettima launches the Nasarawa State Human Capital Development Strategy Document in Lafia, the state capital.

    A release from the focal Nasarawa State Human Capital Development Agency (HCDA) indicates the overarching focus of the strategy as “accelerating growth and development.”

    The occasion shall also feature the launch of the Nasarawa state Gender Transformative Human Capital Development policy framework.

    Human Capital Development was adopted as a development strategy by the National Economic Council in 2018. The aim was to address poverty and ensure sustainable economic growth.

    ” Nigeria’s Human Capital Development program (HCD 1.0) set clear targets and commitments for investment priorities, accelerating investments in human capital, and expanding stakeholder support to drive outcomes in Health, Education, and Labour Force participation in line with the UN Sustainable Development Goals 2030.”

    With a population of about 215million, expected to double to 400million by 2050, the human capital, apart from a huge reserve of oil and gas, which is a finite resource, is Nigeria’s most sustainable development resource.

    A huge population alone is however, not enough. Age and educational attainment are two critical attributes required to make the population amenable to development needs.

    Consequently, the World Bank Human Capital Project defines human capital “as a combination of the knowledge, skills, and health people accumulate throughout their lives that enables them to realise their potential as productive members of society.”

    It is therefore the position of the NEC that, “For Nigeria to unlock its ‘demographic dividend’ and tap into the economic potential of its working age citizens, the country will need to first enhance its investment in its people – particularly women and children.”

    It argues that, “Over the past decade, many of the key metrics relating to Human Capital
    Development (HCD) in Nigeria have been going in the wrong direction.

    Nigeria’s performance across all major global HCD indices, including the United Nations Human Capital Index, the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) Expected
    Human Capital Index, and the World Bank Human Capital Index, is below the global average, as well as below the average for developing economies in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA),” the NEC, Nigeria’s apex economic policy body posited.

    According to a statement by Habiba Balarabe Suleiman, the Director General, Nasarawa State HCDA, successful implementation of the state HCD Strategic Plan 2024-2030 “is pivotal to the socioeconomic growth and sustainable development of Nasarawa state.”

    The launch of the HCD Strategy Document and Nasarawa state Gender Transformative Human Capital Development policy framework by the Vice President opens a new vista in the development aspiration of the state and a benchmark for peer review by other sub-nationals.

  • ECOWAS Departure: Burkina Faso launches biometric passport

    In a move that indicates further severance of relations with the regional body, the government of Burkina Faso has unveiled a new generation biometric instead of the old generation ECOWAS passport.

    This moves puts pay to any likelihood of the French speaking West African country rejoining the ECOWAS fold despite appeals by regional authorities for a change of stand.

    The new passport, unlike the one of the old generation, doesn’t carry the ECOWAS Logo or any related inscriptions on its cover page.

    The new passport is produced by Emptech a Chinese biometrics technology company.

    Following harsh sanctions due to military coups, Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger—three West African nations currently under military rule—announced in January that they would be leaving the 15-member ECOWAS bloc.

    Burkina Faso-Emptech Biometric Passport Launch

    Reuters quotes the country’s Security Minister Mahamaou Sana as affirming that “on this passport, there’s no ECOWAS logo, and no mention of ECOWAS either.”

    The government official adds that “since January, Burkina Faso has decided to withdraw from this body, and this is just a realisation of the action already taken by Burkina Faso.”

    The ECOWAS bloc has a policy on visa-free movement for nationals of member states using either the ECOWAS passport or the regional biometric ID implemented under the World Bank-supported (West Africa Unique Identification for Regional Integration and Inclusion  (WURI) program. Burkina Faso and Niger were among the first six ECOWAS countries to benefit from the WURI initiative.

    President Bola Tinubu, ECOWAS Chairman

    When the countries announced their departure from ECOWAS early in the year, regional officials raised concerns that citizens of the three countries will no longer be able to use the regional passport and ID card.

    According to Burkina 24 TV, Arzouma Daouda Parfait Louré, the director general of the National Identification Agency, stated at the passport’s launch early this month that the accomplishment is the result of a procedure that began in 2022. He said that the outdated passport production system, in use since 2018, had undergone a comprehensive diagnosis.

    The new passports will be produced with technology of the latest generation and in line with security standards for travel documents prescribed by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), the official explained.

    The head of the ID agency announced that one of the latest developments is that people can now apply online for passports using an easily customizable and streamlined data collection method. The passport application process may be tracked by applicants, and passports can be issued in as little as 24 hours, regardless of where the applicant is located in the world.

    It is speculated that funding for this project may have come the $150 million World Bank’s International Development Association approved funding for Burkina Faso earlier this year to enable the West African country to its digital public infrastructure.

  • N570billion was World Bank COVID-19 palliative not FG largess

    Opacity continues to dug the Bola Tinubu Presidency as Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo state disclaims the assertion that the N570 billion released to governors was a handout or bailout from President Bola Tinubu’s government to the 36 states to expand the livelihood support to citizens across the country.
    On Thursday, Mr Makinde explained that the N570 billion was part of the World Bank-assisted NG-CARES project, a programme for results intervention aimed at helping states to recover from the ravages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    On the contrary, President Tinubu had claimed, during the nationwide broadcast on Sunday following the #EndBadGovernance protests that grounded activities in major cities of the country, that his administration had released more than N570 billion to states.
    “Also, more than N570 billion has been released to the 36 states to expand livelihood support to their citizens, while 600,000 nano-businesses have benefited from our nano-grants. An additional 400,000 more nano-businesses are expected to benefit,” Mr. Tinubu claimed in the national broadcast.
    Debunking the claim, Gov Makinde asserts:
    “Let me state categorically that this is yet another case of misrepresentation of facts. The said funds were part of the World Bank-assisted NG-CARES project—a programme for results intervention. The World Bank facilitated an intervention to help States in Nigeria with COVID-19 Recovery. CARES means COVID-19 Action Recovery Economic Stimulus. It was called ‘Programme for Results’ because states had to use their money in advance to implement the programme. 
    ,
    “After the World Bank verified the amount spent by the state, it reimbursed the states through the platform provided at the federal level. The federal government did not give any State money; they were simply the conduit through which the reimbursements were made to states for money already spent,” the Oyo governor pointed out.
    Acknowledging that the World Bank fund was a loan and not a grant to the states, Mr Makinde explained that each state of the federation is expected to repay the loan adding that the NG-CARES, which was christened Oyo-CARES predated the present federal administration.
    “So, in direct response to the message, the federal government did not give Oyo state any money. We were reimbursed funds (N5.98 billion in the first instance and N822 million in the second instance) we invested in the three result areas of NG-CARES, which includes inputs distribution to smallholder farmers within our State.
    “In fact, when the World Bank saw our model for the distribution of inputs preceded by biometric capturing of beneficiary farmers, they adopted it as the NG-CARES model,” the governor stated.
  • Hunger Protest: D-DAY in Nigeria?

    Hunger Protest: D-DAY in Nigeria?

    A blogger called it the “Ides of March in August.” Some called it the “Day of Rage.” Others have aptly described it as the “day to take back Nigeria.” Call it what you may but today is August 1, 2024 and what shall not be in doubt is that President Bola Ahmad Tinubu shall today play host to some not-too-August visitors, as Nigerians from all works of life pour onto the streets, if all go as planned, to demand better treatment from the leadership of their country.

    Operated under the hashtag: #END BAD GOVERNANCE, a group of Nigerians issued a notice to the Federal Government some weeks back with the intention to embark on ten days of mass protest, starting August 1-10, 2024, to demand reversal of economic polices that the current government had introduced. Some of these policies include the withdrawal of subsidy on petrol, hike in energy (electric power) tariff, further liberalization of the foreign exchange market.

    It is worth repeating here that these policies were dictated by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, so called Bretton Woods Institutions, created in December 1945 to mastermind the implementation of the Bretton Woods Agreement of July 1944. Over the years, the two institutions have served “as important pillars for international capital financing and trade activities.” Unfortunately, their advises and the prescriptions contained in the Structural Adjustment Policies (SAPs) that they recommend, have always failed to serve the interest of needy Third World Countries.

    From countries of the Latin Americas to poor countries in Africa and the Asia, the one-size-fits-all policies that these two lending institutions propose to third world countries often lead to mass revolts, often because of the hardship that they cause. As for Nigeria, it is a deja vu as the current episode is Nigeria’s second attempt at implementing SAP. The first also ended in a fiasco as the country was thrown into a turmoil of mass revolt that is today remembered as the anti-SAP Riots.

    Same as now, the Anti-SAP Riots were a result of the government decision to implement the Structural Adjustment Program (SAP) in 1986 under the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in an effort to counteract the impact of declining oil revenue and devaluing the Naira, cutting back on social spending, implementing widespread layoffs, being measures taken to guarantee Nigeria’s eligibility for loans from the IMF.

    Public resentment to IMF Structural Adjustment Programmes are fueled by several factors. Apart from the very bitter pills that they prescribe, the failure of the ruling elite to subordinate themselves to the same lifestyle modification that they recommend to the mass of the people, spike most of the anger that drive the protests. In Nigeria, just as the ongoing episode in Kenya, while the people grapple with cost of living crisis, politicians and their families, supposed servants of the people, revel in obscene affluence.

    In Nigeria, the numbers tell all the story. Down by 370.55 percent, the local currency was so massively devalued that a US dollar today exchanges for 1,660 naira, instead of N448.0 by end of 2022. With this fall in the value of the naira, and Nigeria being import dependent, the price of all goods skyrocketed. Just to give an example, rice, Nigeria’s most staple food has become a luxury item in many family menus as a 50kg bag, hitherto sold at N7,500 in 2023 now sells between N85,000 and N100,000. Food inflation estimated at 40 percent. While interest rate hovers around 28-30 percent.

    President Tinubu, either wittingly or otherwise, it was, who set the tone and pace for the current harsh economic reality buffeting Nigerians when he announced that subsidy on petrol was gone while reading his inaugural speech. Even the most strident advocates of subsidy removal sharply disagreed with the method of withdrawing the very critical subsidy on petrol by the president. This was due to how he announced it without proper review and implementation plan.

    The rest, as they say, is now history. The country now tithers precariously by the edge of the cliff. Whether the people will troupe out to carry out the threat of a mass protest shall become manifest momentarily. What is of critical essence going forward is how the law enforcement agents contain the protest that the Federal Government and the sub-nationals can not be excused as having done enough to stave off.

  • Federal Government Seeks fresh World Bank loan

    Federal Government Seeks fresh World Bank loan

    The federal government of Nigeria is seeking to obtain a fresh $1 billion loan from the world bank.

    According to reports, the loan will be used address the challenges facing Internally Displaced Persons and their host communities, as well as bolster rural access and agricultural marketing in the country.

    This was contained in a recent World Bank document titled, ‘Solutions for the Internally Displaced and Host Communities Project’ and ‘Rural Access and Agricultural Marketing Project – Scale Up.’

    According to the loan breakdown, while the IDPs’ loan is put at $500m, the rural access and agricultural marketing project loan is estimated at $550m.

    The fund is expected to provide help to communities in Nigeria badly affected by insecurity.

    “The proposed project will utilise a three-pronged approach to develop sustainable solutions for IDPs and host communities in Northern Nigeria.

    “First, the proposed project aims to provide tailored solutions for each of the targeted states and communities, recognizing that each internal displacement situation is specific and localised, with conflict, violence and/or climate challenges presenting a different level and set of vulnerabilities for host communities.

    “Gender, age, and special needs of individuals also play a role, as well as the length of displacement, number of times displaced and other factors.

    “Thus, responses will be adapted to address the specific needs of vulnerable populations within displacement-affected states and communities. Second, the proposed project will follow a ‘People-in-Place’ approach, integrating the needs of the people and the impacts on the place where they settle,” the document stated.

    According to a review by a World Bank team, Northern Nigeria, especially Borno, Adamawa and Yobe, has experienced the highest numbers of internally displaced persons.

    This is primarily due to the ongoing conflict involving Boko Haram, as well as other factors such as banditry and conflicts between farmers and herders, leading to the displacement of over 3.5 million people.

    Since 2009, Boko Haram has continued to carry out heinous crimes on Nigerians, This is primarily due to the ongoing conflict involving Boko Haram, as well as other factors such as banditry and conflicts between farmers and herders, leading to the displacement of over 3.5 million people.

    Since 2009, Boko Haram has continued to carry out heinous crimes on Nigerians, while banditry has been described as a variant of Boko Haram.

  • Nigeria’s Diaspora Remittances Predicted to Surpass $20 Billion in 2023, World Bank Reports

    The World Bank’s recent Migration and Development Brief forecasts a significant upsurge in diaspora remittances flowing into Nigeria to surpass a staggering $20 billion by year-end, 2023. This surge reflects a broader trend of a 1.9% increase in total remittances within the Sub-Saharan Africa region.

    The report, unveiled this month, outlines projections indicating that remittances to Sub-Saharan Africa will rise from $53 billion in 2022 to $54 billion in 2023. Furthermore, it anticipates a continued upward trajectory, reaching $55 billion by 2024. The tempered growth in 2023 is attributed to the sluggish pace of expansion in high-income economies, where a significant number of Sub-Saharan African migrants earn their livelihoods.

    Nigeria, serving as the recipient of 38% of remittance flows to the region, experienced a marginal uptick of approximately two percent. Similarly, other key beneficiaries such as Ghana and Kenya registered estimated gains of 5.6% and 3.8%, respectively.

    The report also highlights the influence of fixed exchange rates and capital controls, diverting remittances away from official channels towards unofficial ones.

    Looking ahead to 2024, the projections indicate a 2.5% increase in remittance flows to the region. Notably, remittances from the United States have exhibited stability, while the euro area’s recovery remains hampered, with output lingering 2.2% below pre-pandemic projections.

    The World Bank’s findings underscore the resilience and substantial contribution of Diaspora remittances to the economic landscape of Nigeria and the wider Sub-Saharan African region, albeit in the face of ongoing challenges in global economic recovery.

  • $750m NG-CARES Programme Doing Well- World Bank

    The World Bank has aid that the Nigeria COVID-19 Action Recovery and Economic Stimulus (NG-CARES) programme is doing well in addressing poverty in the country.

    Prof. Foluso Okunmadewa, World Bank Task Team Leader for NG-CARES, stated this in an interview with newsmen on the sidelines of Mid-Term Review Mission meeting held on Wednesday in Abuja.

    Okunmadewa said that the bank had so far disbursed over 300 million dollars, assuring that all the remaining resources would be released within the next eight months.

    “We are quite happy about what has happened to the programme. It is still very active in all the 36 states of the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

    “And they are all very eager to get even into the next phase of the programme because caring for the poor and vulnerable in Nigeria is still the thing that government is concern about

    “Each state of the federation have been encourage to put together a set of interventions into one programme that totally cares for the poor and vulnerable.”

    The don recalled that the programme became preeminent immediately after the COVID-19 crisis, where both the livelihood and the lives of people were threatened.

    “And so government was responsive enough at the federal and state levels to put this programme together and the world bank gladly agreed to support it.

    “Now two and half years after it was being put in place we have felt is good to take a look at how fair is the programme going.

    “And particularly how well is the world bank assistance, whether it is relevant or not and whether it is achieving the desire results.

    “Of course, I will like to say that it is doing well now but after a very difficult start. It had a challenging start, had a slow start but now it has pick up and it is even almost exceeding the expectations

    “To the extent that there is clearly a desire to continue the programme at the government level and also the world bank to also support the next face of it.”

    Earlier, the National Coordinators of NG-CARES, Dr Abdulkarim Obaje, said that the programme had so far impacted into the lives of over three million Nigerians.

    Obaje said the 36 states and the FCT have contributed between N88 billion to N90 billion since the inception of the programme.

    He explained that the instrument of operation and strategy put into the designed of the programme emphasised on community participation.

    He also said that the emphasised of the programme had moved from COVID-19 to deploying the resources of the community to address their peculiar needs.

    “The programme is doing very well now and there is increase phase of disbursement and the programme is also becoming more popular among the poor and vulnerable the nation.

    “And then top government functionaries at the federal are also beginning to ask questions to become interested in what the NG-CARES is doing.

    “This is a positive development, it is a programme that relatively young as a programme but it has inherited other programme that have been existing for quite sometime.”

    Also, Mr Sonny Ekedayen, the Commissioner of Ministry of Economic Planning, Delta state, said NG-CARES is one programme whose relevance we are just discovering that is even more today than it was when it started.

    “I am very proud to say that my state delta is very active in the programme and one of those forerunners who signed on to this programme newly when it came in.

    “And we have domesticated it in our state for which we have not only gotten commendation from the world bank but also from the National Coordinating body.

    “Even our citizens too are now looking at it as a veritable means of state intervention.”