Category: Judiciary

  • Nigeria Defeats European Dynamics in $6.2m Arbitration Case

    Nigeria Defeats European Dynamics in $6.2m Arbitration Case

    Nigeria has secured a major legal victory after an arbitral tribunal dismissed in its entirety a $6.2 million claim brought against the country by European Dynamics UK Ltd, an international technology contractor, over a disputed national e-Procurement project.

    The ruling followed an arbitration initiated by the company against the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) and was delivered at the International Centre for Arbitration and Mediation, Abuja. The decision, which is final and not subject to appeal, was handed down by Mrs Funmi Roberts, the sole arbitrator.

    This development was disclosed in a statement issued by Mr Kamarudeen Ogundele, Senior Assistant on Communication and Publicity to the Lateef Fagbemi, the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice.

    According to the statement, the tribunal dismissed all claims by European Dynamics, thereby relieving Nigeria of a potential financial exposure estimated at more than $6.2 million—equivalent to about ₦9.3 billion in claimed payments and damages.

    European Dynamics had sought approximately $2.4 million for alleged milestone completions, $3 million in general damages, and an additional $800,000 as settlement claims, all of which were rejected by the tribunal.

    Background to the Dispute

    The dispute arose from a contract for the design, development, customisation, supply, installation and maintenance of a national electronic Government Procurement (eGP) system. The project was financed with support from the World Bank and was designed to enhance transparency, accountability and efficiency in federal public procurement.

    Upon assuming office, the Director-General of the BPP, Adebowale Adedokun, inherited both a stalled technology project and ongoing arbitration proceedings. Although discussions had previously taken place regarding an out-of-court settlement, the bureau opted to proceed with arbitration, insisting that payments must be strictly tied to verifiable value delivered.

    Tribunal Upholds Nigeria’s Position

    Central to the dispute was the User Acceptance Test (UAT) conducted by the BPP, which revealed significant functional deficiencies in the system, including critical omissions and errors affecting performance.

    The bureau argued that unlike traditional supply contracts, software customisation projects require performance validation, with delivery deemed complete only after a successful UAT confirming compliance with technical, statutory and operational requirements.

    The tribunal agreed with Nigeria’s position, holding that the identified deficiencies were the contractor’s responsibility to remedy at no additional cost. It further ruled that European Dynamics, as the technical expert, bore full responsibility for ensuring compliance with contractual obligations, regardless of any earlier technical documents approved by the BPP.

    The arbitrator also found no contractual basis for the contractor’s claim that multiple project phases had been merged into a single phase, noting that payments under the contract were clearly structured in phases.

    A Landmark Signal for Public Sector Contracting

    Presenting the arbitral award to the Minister of Justice, Adedokun described the outcome as a landmark moment for public sector technology contracting in Nigeria.

    “This particular vendor has taken various African countries to court and won every single case. Nigeria is the first to defeat them,” he said, praising the confidence placed in Nigerian legal professionals.

    He expressed appreciation to the Attorney-General for authorising the proceedings, noting that the decision saved the country billions of naira that can now be redirected toward critical national development.

    Commending the BPP leadership and the legal team, Fagbemi described the victory as a strong signal to the international community.

    “By standing up to European Dynamics, Nigeria has instilled courage in other African nations to protect their own resources. It is no longer business as usual,” the minister said.

    Nigeria’s legal team was led by Johnson & Wilner LLP, a Nigerian business and technology law firm, with Basil Udotai, the firm’s founding partner, leading the arbitration alongside strategic partners and associates.

    The ministry noted that legal representatives for the BPP have encouraged the integration of lessons from the arbitration into ongoing e-procurement reforms, with the aim of strengthening contract performance oversight and reducing the risk of future disputes.

  • Bianca Ojukwu Urges Peaceful Action Over Nnamdi Kanu’s Imprisonment

    Bianca Ojukwu Urges Peaceful Action Over Nnamdi Kanu’s Imprisonment

    Owerri, November 26, 2025 – The Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Mrs. Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, has called on the people of the South-East to respond to the imprisonment of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu with dialogue and peaceful engagement, rather than anger or violence.

    Speaking at the 14th Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu Memorial Day at the Ojukwu Memorial Library in Owerri, Mrs. Ojukwu emphasized that hope for Kanu’s release remains through patient and organized efforts.

    “The solution is not knives, guns, or fighting among ourselves,” she said.

    This Christmas, we should meet with our National Assembly members, governors, and even President Bola Tinubu to discuss a peaceful way to secure his freedom.”

    She also urged the South-East to learn from other regions in solving challenges peacefully and called on parents to teach children the Igbo language to preserve culture and values.

    Highlighting the impact of insecurity on the region, she said kidnappings and violence have driven away investors, both local and foreign.

    She cited her late husband’s unconditional pardon after the civil war as an example of what dialogue and patience can achieve.

    Chief Ugwunna Ajaelu, chairman of the occasion, echoed her call for calm and diplomatic efforts to ensure Kanu’s release.

  • NBA Yenagoa Law Week features Osinbanjo, focuses on AI in legal practice

    NBA Yenagoa Law Week features Osinbanjo, focuses on AI in legal practice

    By

    Famous Obebi Famous

    As the demands for pragmatic leadership continue to resonate amidst pervasive public dissatisfaction with Nigeria’s judicial sector and political fabric, the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Yenagoa Branch, has emerged as a pacesetter in projecting the Law as a means of arresting a dangerous slide into anarchy.
    The 2025 Law Week of the NBA’s Yenagoa Branch was in many respects an elevation from previous editions. Held under the theme “Setting the Pace: Law, Leadership, and Transformational Development,” this year’s event did more than gather the finest legal minds. It sparked a necessary national conversation about the evolving role of law as a catalyst for holding leadership accountable to the people, for ensuring the rule of law and for radically improving access to justice for the public. A week of passion and public engagement
    After several weeks of diligent preparation by the Law Week Planning Committee, the anticipated programme teed off on May 5, 2025, with a well orchestrated Press Conference at the Koripamo Ungbuku High Court Complex in Yenagoa, the Bayelsa State Capital.


    Addressing a packed room of journalists from national and international media, the NBA Yenagoa Branch Chairman, Mr. Somina Johnbull, set the tone: “The branch is poised to build on the successes of previous editions of the Law Week to ensure that participants and guests have a first-rate experience this year; by offering solutions to generational challenges affecting leadership in Nigeria.”
    He said with the investment in critical infrastructure upgrade in the state judiciary, such as automatic recording system and research support for judges, as well as the availability of small claims courts and a multi-door courthouse, litigation and adjudication had been greatly enhanced.
    On his part, Chairman of the Law Week Planning Committee, Iniruo Wills, remarked that stakeholder satisfaction was the key objective in organizing the events, hence the choice of theme and sub-themes that address issues of vital public interest, such as governance based on the rule of law and revolutionizing access to justice.
    But as they say, health is wealth and all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. So on the morning of Saturday May 10th, the Branch Chairman, Somina Johnbull, led the teeming lawyers in a 10-kilometre roadwalk to keep body and mind fit. Only a sound mind in a sound body can do justice to the aggrieved. In the evening of that day, the lawyers let their hair down in an Embeleakpo (Ijaw for enjoyment) Night, where they shared fun times by way of various indoor games such as Chess, Scrabble, Whot and Monopoly, along with music and dancing, spiced with roasted fish and like delicacies at the poolside of a major hotel.
    Continuing in that tempo, a novelty football match between the Branch and the Pharmaceutical Society of Nigeria took place at the Samson Siasia Stadium, Yenagoa on Monday May 12, ending in favour of the learned team.
    And the next day, the Branch Chairman, Mr Johnbull, the Planning Committee Chairman, Mr Wills, and the Law Week Facilitator, Dr (Mrs) Boma Miebai, led the branch to pay a visit to the Daisy Home for Special Children at Igbogene, where they spent about an hour with the children and donated food items worth over a million Naira, after a joint rendition of the classic charity song by global stars, We are the World. Before leaving, the lawyers took time to motivate the kids towards becoming teachers, doctors, lawyers, pastors and successful business people in the future.


    The week’s icing on the cake was the plenary session held on Friday May 16 at the ornate NCDMB Conference Hall, reportedly the first non oil and gas event to be held in the impressive Hall. The venue’s architectural elegance was matched only by the intellectual weight of the audience and resource persons of the day, headlined by one of Africa’s leading policy icons and public speakers, Prof Yemi Osinbajo (GCON, SAN), former Vice President of Nigeria, who delivered the keynote address.
    Declaring the session open, the Bayelsa State Governor, Senator Douye Diri, stated unequivocally, “If lawyers stand by the truth and the rule of law, Nigeria will survive-and thrive.” His words resonated across the capacity-filled auditorium and synced with the profound exploration of the intersections of law, leadership and transformational development that followed.
    Chief Judge of Bayelsa State, Justice Matilda Ayemieye, in her remarks stated her confidence in the Keynote Speaker’s renowned ability to do justice to the theme and also expressed her admiration for the organizers of the Law Week, noting that they had “raised the bar”, putting Bayelsa State in bright lights
    Also speaking the State’s Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Biriyai Dambo, SAN, thanked the NBA “for choosing themes that reflect the urgent really of our time”, noting that in moments of upheaval people look to the law as a hope. In quotable words, he charged the NBA to continue to be “a conscience of the nation, not just an association.”


    In what many have described as one of the most thought-provoking addresses of the year, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo delivered a keynote titled “The Legal Profession: A Vision for a New Era.”
    With characteristic depth and clarity, evoking comparison with former US President Barrack Obama’s speech making,, Osinbajo glided though the emerging landscape of technology and law. “We are at the threshold of a major transformation,” he said, firing the first salvo. “Artificial Intelligence—tools like ChatGPT—are already reshaping the legal profession. The question isn’t whether we should adapt, but how.”
    He warned that AI is not simply a convenience; it is a force that will change how legal services are delivered in the years to come, adding that, “Our profession needs a new set of tools to work with, that is AI tools which … could process huge volumes of documents in minutes.”


    He said, “Before 2022, Lawyers were the sole gatekeepers of legal knowledge. But with AI, we are no longer the custodian and gatekeeper of legal knowledge.” However, he was quick to stress that no machine could replace a lawyer’s ethical compass or moral reasoning. “What machines can’t replicate,” he said, “is the lawyer’s ability to exercise discretion, to uphold justice, and to reason ethically.”
    Against this backdrop he pointed out that the true value of lawyers must lie in focusing on the aspects of legal practice that machines cannot replicate. So in the face of this foreboding threat, what can lawyers do to remain relevant and competitive? The erudite silk has a gamut of solutions:
    First, he asserted that the legal community must reform its educational system and curriculum to reflect new realities, urging a paradigm shift from rote theoretical training to hands-on, mentorship-driven models. He cited the British “filtered entry” approach as an example of how Nigeria might professionalize the Bar and the Bench to be effective and efficient.


    Osinbajo also called for cross-disciplinary training for lawyers and the integration of AI as a subject in the curriculum while legal education must emphasize problem solving and adopt simulation-based learning. What is more, he posited that the mandatory one year law school where lawyers are kept in classrooms and taught physically was anachronistic and must now be reviewed, emphasizing the imperative for online, virtual learning in law school and university campuses. “The days of in person law school are over. This is the emerging trend,” he pointed out.
    Pivoting to the ethical dimension, Professor Osinbanjo observed that with the integrity and reputation of the bar and bench greatly threatened by corruption, it was time for lawyers to “Sacrifice personal comfort for collective growth” He expressed worry over the unprecedented spate of conflicting court judgments which has greatly eroded the credibility of the legal system, urging the courts to “focus on justice over faults” “We have entered a new era, one that demands a new tool kit. This must be the pillar of our renewed vision”, he intoned.

    Bridging the Gap between theory and practice


    Following the keynote, a robust panel discussion unfolded, moderated by the erudite Justice Peter Affen, who provided a sobering reminder that legal education in Nigeria must catch up with global technological realities.
    Boma Ayomide Alabi, SAN, Chairperson of the NBA Section on Legal Practice, was forthright when asked of the possibility of AI replacing lawyers: “AI will not replace lawyers. But lawyers who embrace AI will replace those who don’t.” Her point was echoed by Mr. Naboth Onyesoh, Director of Legal Services at NCDMB, who emphasized the Impact of law on business and investment: “The UK’s legal sector contributes over £45 billion annually to the GDP. Imagine what Nigeria could do if we reformed and digitized our legal systems.”.
    But according to him, “People choose to arbitrate in the UK, causing capital flight due to the problem of lack of integrity and prestige here in Nigeria” He urged lawyers to take advantage of the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Act which provides for local content (indigenous lawyers) participation in oil and gas matters.
    On his part, Hon. Kemela Okara, former Secretary to the Bayelsa State Government, spoke on the role of government in promotung the rule of Law. “Law alone can’t do it; the government must be the catalyst enforcing laws, investing in the judiciary, and modeling discipline”, he said.
    On his part, another panelist, Dr. Ayibakuro Matthew, framed the conversation philosophically, declaring that “a society with bad laws being implemented by good people will produce better justice than good laws being implemented by bad people. But with both good laws and good people, we can truly transform.”

    Revolutionizing ease of access to justice
    Prof Festus Emiri, SAN, former Deputy Director-General of the Nigeria Law School, gave a most thought-provoking presentation on the need to improve ease of access to justice even at the highest level of leadership. He skillfully touched on various critical sectors. On legal education reform, the Professor advocated for a shift from content-based to concept-focused curricula, centralizing experiential and apprenticeship education, and either abolishing or significantly reforming vocational legal education. On judiciary reforms, the distinguished Professor advocated for a more responsive and efficient judiciary through periodic institutional assessment and continuing education.
    The day after the epic Plenary Session, the lawyers had their traditional annual Dinner/ Gala Night at the Governor Diepreye Alamieyeseigha Banquet Hall, with Prof Solomon Ebobrah giving a dinner talk on the quizzical topic “The Legal Profession: One Way Creek or Ocean of Opportunities?” With every reason to do so, the Yenagoa legal community marked the formal end of the Law Week on Sunday 18th May with a special thanksgiving service at the St Peter’s Anglican Church, Yenagoa.
    A new standard is set, a new page of history opens
    Indeed, the 2025 NBA Yenagoa Law Week will be remembered for opening vistas of insight and opportunity for a new era of bridging the gap between law, leadership and transformational development. The Yenagoa Branch of NBA has been receiving applause since the events, for raising the bar in branch law week standards.
    Indeed, the Yenagoa Bar made an eloquent statement — that it has come of age and is setting the pace

  • Sen Natasha Akpoti: N/Central women write Tinubu

    Sen Natasha Akpoti: N/Central women write Tinubu

    Decry strong arm tactics. Say FG lawsuit sends wrong signal

    North Central women on Saturday urged the Federal Government not to trample on the rights of citizens.

    ’Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s rights are slowly extinguished. Her complaints, protests and appeals are now treated as seditious murmurings’’

    They also advised the Federal Government not to provide a justification for political anarchism.

    The women in a statement in Lafia said the lawsuit against Akpoti-Uduaghan was capable of sending wrong signals of political oppression of women in Nigeria.

    They urged President Bola Tinubu to prevent the 10th Senate from being ill governed.

    The zonal women advised President Tinubu to go to the root of the matter involving the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio and the Senator representing Kogi Central, Chief Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

    The statement issued by the Chairperson of North Central Women Front (NCWF), Mrs. Mary Adamu, described the recent case filed by the Federal Government against Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan as a desire for conquest and a bad way of maintaining or restoring stability, patriotism and morality among the people.

    ‘’The problem in the Senate cannot be resolved in this manner. It is in going to the root that you will find the solution of a number of problems of the 10th Senate which the leadership cannot settle’’.

    The statement counseled Tinubu not to yield to the fatal temptation of oppressing women in the country.

    Particularly, the women urged Tinubu to apply human wisdom, follow public reason and act aright by asking the Attorney General and Minister of Justice to quickly withdraw the lawsuit from the court.

    The statement emphasized sincere reconciliation and the question of morality. The women praised Akpoti-Uduaghan for her honest heart.

    They also underscored shameful methods in conflict resolution and the activities of fierce and brutal men in the country.

  • Court dismisses Philip Shaibu’s N50bn suit against ex-Gov. Obaseki, others

    Court dismisses Philip Shaibu’s N50bn suit against ex-Gov. Obaseki, others

    The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday dismissed a N50 billion fundamental rights enforcement suit filed by Philip Shaibu, former Deputy Governor of Edo, against ex-Gov. Godwin Obaseki and others

    Justice Peter Lifu, in a ruling, dismissed the suit following an application to withdraw the suit by Anita Oteh, who appeared for Shaibu.

    Upon resumed hearing in the matter, Oteh informed the court that parties in the suit had settled their differences, hence, the need to withdraw the suit.

    However, Aliyu Abdulkadir, who represented the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), the 4th defendants in the suit, told the court that he was not aware of the settlement.

    According to him, if there is any settlement, we should be informed so that we are well guided.

    “However, we are not opposed to the application for withdrawal and will also not be asking for a cost, but I will make a simple request,” he said.

    Abdulkadir then prayed the court to dismissed the suit.

    Oteh disagreed with Abdulkadir’s request, urging the court to grant their application for the withdrawal of the suit.

    Justice Lifu, in his ruling, held that, having joined issues in the matter, the proper thing was to dismiss the case.

    “In view of the fact that issues have been joined in this matter, this suit is hereby dismissed in its entirety”, he ruled.

    In the writ of summons, had sued Edo State Governor; Inspector-General (I-G) of Police; Director, Department of State Services (DSS), AGF and Attorney General of Edo as 1st to 5th defendants respectively.

    In the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/914/2024 dated July  4, 2024 but filed July 19, 2024 by his counsel, Egwuaba Reuben, Shaibu sought right reliefs.

    The ex-deputy governor sought an order of the court awarding the sum of N50 billion to him for aggravated and exemplary damages against the defendants to be paid jointly for the illegal and unconstitutional violation of his fundamental rights.

    He also sought an order of perpetual injunction, restraining the defendants and their agents from further arresting or detaining him, repeating or continuing any act or further acts in violation of his fundamental rights on issues bordering on or connected to facts of the case without the leave of the court.

    The plaintiff equally sought for the sum of N100 million as the cost of filing the suit.

    In his witness statement of oath deposed to by himself, Shaibu averred that he was elected deputy governor of Edo and his tenure was to end on Nov. 11, 2024

    He however alleged that on instigation of Obaseki and with the aid of the I-G, “I was unlawfully removed from the office before the expiration of my tenure which same issue is a subject of litigation pending before this court.”

    He further alleged that upon discovery that he had been  removed as deputy governor, the I-G withdrew all his security personnel who ought to have protected his life until the expiration of his term in office.

    Shaibu also said his attention was drawn to a publication on July 2, 2024, wherein the Edo government issued a notice directing the retrieval of 22 official government vehicles in his custody, among others.

    He, therefore, prayed the court to declare that the attempt by the 1st defendant (Obaseki) to instigate the 2nd to 5th defendants to be arrested was unlawful and amounted to an attempt to infringe on his fundamental rights guaranteed under the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), among other reliefs.

    It was observed that no lawyer appeared for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 5th defendants on Monday.

    Justice James Omotosho of a sister court had, on July 17, 2024, reinstated Shaibu as deputy governor, three months after the Edo House of Assembly impeached him.

    Justice Omotosho held that the impeachment by the house was illegal.

  • Rivers LG: S/Court reserves ruling on suit seeking sack of Chairmen 

    Rivers LG: S/Court reserves ruling on suit seeking sack of Chairmen 

    The Supreme Court has postponed its decision on an appeal challenging the validity of the local government elections in Rivers State, held on October 5, 2024.

     The All Progressives Congress (APC) is seeking to overturn the results of the polls.  

    A five-member panel, led by Justice Uwani Abba-Aji, concluded the hearing after all parties presented their final arguments. 

    The APC’s lawyer, J.B. Daudu, asked the court to nullify the election, while Governor Siminalaye Fubara’s lawyer, Yusuf Ali, and Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission’s (RSIEC) counsel, Chris Uche, defended the poll’s legitimacy.  

    Earlier, the Court of Appeal had overturned a ruling by the Federal High Court in Abuja, which had halted the elections.

     The appellate court stated that the lower court had no jurisdiction over the matter, as state elections are not covered under Section 28 of the Electoral Act.  

    The initial ruling by Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court had barred the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from providing a voter register for the election, citing non-compliance with legal requirements. 

    The court also criticized RSIEC for failing to issue the mandatory 90-day election notice.  

    With the Supreme Court set to decide, the fate of the Rivers LG election remains uncertain.

  • Appeal Court affirms IPOB as a terrorist organisation

    Appeal Court affirms IPOB as a terrorist organisation

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja has upheld the decision to label the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) as a terrorist organization.

     The court, in a unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel led by Justice Hamma Barka, supported the Federal High Court’s 2017 judgment that banned the group.

     The court agreed that the Federal Government acted within the law due to the threat IPOB posed to national security.

     The court dismissed IPOB’s appeal, stating it lacked merit. 

    The IPOB’s legal team, led by Senior Advocate of Nigeria Chukwuma-Machukwu Umeh, had argued that the proscription was unlawful and misrepresented facts, claiming it unjustly labeled millions of Igbo Nigerians as terrorists.

     Despite this, the appeal was rejected, reinforcing the Federal High Court’s earlier ruling that prohibited IPOB’s activities, especially in the South-East and South-South regions.

  • Do not lie against me, embattled producer tells Singer, Mercy Chinwo

    Do not lie against me, embattled producer tells Singer, Mercy Chinwo

    Mr. Ezekiel Onyedikachukwu, the founder of Eeze Conceptz Limited, has informed Mercy Chinwo, a renowned gospel singer, that her allegations against him are false and unfounded.

    This was said by Mr. Maxwell Opara, Onyedikachukwu’s attorney, in a statement he signed and provided to the media on Saturday in Abuja.

    According to Opara, Chinwo allegedly broke the terms of her record label and management agreement with her label, Eeze Conceptz Limited, and lied to the EFCC about his client.

    The lawyer made it clear that Onyedikachukwu was never Chinwo’s manager.

    He said that his client was her producer, who occasionally in 2017 scouted and found her singing talent, nurtured it, and put her in the spotlight inside the gospel music industry.

    He also said that the allegation that the embattled producer diverted the singer’s $345,000 U.S. dollars in royalties was false.

    “The members of public must take note; that the allegations made against our client by Mercy Chinwo and the EFCC before obtaining the arrest warrant order for the arrest of our client were false and unfounded.

    “This is evident as contained in the processes presented by the EFCC before the Honorable Court prior to obtaining the said order, wherein the EFCC alleged our client was Mercy Chinwo’s manager which he is not and never was.

    “Again, the allegation that our client diverted Mercy Chinwo’s funds is also totally false and that our client could not be reached, which both Mercy Chinwo, and the EFCC very well know how our client could be reached and apprehended in such events.”

    “Consequently, we have commenced the procedure in line with the rules of the Honorable acourt to have the said order set aside or vacated.

    “And we strongly believe that, once the facts and evidences are truthfully placed before the Honorable Court, the Honorable Court will do that which is right and just in the circumstance.

    “Hence, we urge the members of the public to disregard every smear publication and campaign coordinated by Mercy Chinwo against our client.”

    He alleged that Chinwo signed a Label and Artist Management Contract for a five-year term beginning from 2017 to 2022 with their client but reneged.

    According to Okpara, the contract covers among  other things, ownership of the catalogue and splits of all royalties derived from the exploitation of music catalogue developed, financed and promoted  by the record label.

    The lawyer said in the midst of the dispute, Onyedikachukwu was allegedly detained at the EFCC Ilorin office between April 16, 2024 and April 25, 2024,

    He said during the period, the commission carried out extensive audit of Onyedikachukwu’s bank accounts and found no evidence of wrongdoings.

    He said a fundamental rights enforcement suit was filed at the Federal High Court (FHC) in Lagos Division on July 17, 2024, against the anti-graft agency, Chinwo and others, to restrain them from further harassment, arrest and detention of their client.

    “It therefore came as a rude shock for the same commission to claim that Mr Onyedikachukwu’s had not been located and procured an ex-parte warrant of arrest on him.

    “These schemes are targeted to malign the Label and its Founder and they will be very firmly resisted within the ambit of the law,” he said.

    NAN reports that Justice Alexander Owoeye of a FHC in Lagos had, on Thursday, issued an arrest warrant against Onyedikachukwu.

    The order followed an ex-parte motion moved by EFCC’s lawyer, Bilikisu Buhari, over alleged diversion of the singer’s $345,000 in royalties from her digital platforms and events.

    Justice Owoeye adjourned the matter until Jan. 24 for Onyedikachukwu’s arraignment.(

  • Alleged $9.6bn P&ID scam: I’ve no witness to call, Briton tells court

    Alleged $9.6bn P&ID scam: I’ve no witness to call, Briton tells court

    The British national, Mr. James Nolan, who jumped bail in the ongoing trial linked to alleged 9.6 billion dollars Process and Industrial Development (P&ID) Ltd scandal, on Thursday, said he does not intend to call any witness.

    Nolan told Justice Obiora Egwuatu of a Federal High Court in Abuja through his lawyer, Michael Ajara.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), in the 20-count charge, named Micad Project City Services Limited and Nolan as 1st and 2nd defendants in the money laundering offences.

    Nolan and Micad Project, a company where he is a director, were arraigned in May 2022.

    The duo pleaded not guilty to the charge and Nolan, who is also a director in P&ID Ltd, was remanded in Kuje Correctional Centre.

    After he met his bail conditions of N100 million with a surety and was admitted to bail following the variation of the bail from N500 million, Nolan stopped attending court proceedings and fled Nigeria.

    Nolan was declared wanted by the court and an order was made for his arrest anywhere he is sighted.

    The EFCC lawyer, Bala Sanga, equally applied that Nolan should be tried in absentia and the prayer was granted.

    Although the fleeing Briton was arrested by the International Criminal Police Organisation (INTERPOL) in Italy on Jan. 27, 2024, during a visit he paid to his wife, he was yet to be extradited back to Nigeria to face his trial.

    Meanwhile, when the matter was called on Thursday, Sanga told the court that the business of the day would have been for the prosecution to call their last witness.

    “But upon review of the case, we found that it is superfluous and therefore  we are dispensing with the last witness,” he said.

    Nolan’s counsel, Ajara, said he had no objection to the anti-graft agency lawyer’s submission.

    He, however, said that after the evaluation of the EFCC’s evidence, they would be relying on the prosecution’s case.

    “Based on the evidence already before the court adduced by the prosecution, we shall be resting our case on theirs.

    “So we don’t intend to call any witness,”:he told the court.

    Justice Egwuatu adjourned the matter until March 10 for adoption of final written  addresses of the parties.

    It would be recalled that a sister court presided over by Justice Donatus Okorowo had, on July 3, 2024, ordered the closure of two companies linked to Nolan, over the involvement in the P&ID Ltd fraud.

    Justice Okorowo, who had since been elevated to the Appeal Court, in two separate judgments, held that the two companies were found guilty of money laundering offences.

    Consequently, Okorowo ordered that the companies be wound up and their assets be forfeited to the federal government.

    The companies were Trinity Biotech Nigeria Limited and Resorts Express Concept Nigeria Ltd.

  • Tinubu To Grant Presidential Pardons 

    Tinubu To Grant Presidential Pardons 

     

    The Nigerian government has announced its intention to grant presidential pardons to certain convicts in correctional facilities across the country. 

    To implement this, a Presidential Advisory Committee on the Prerogative of Mercy was inaugurated in Abuja on Wednesday.  

    This committee, led by Attorney-General and Minister of Justice Lateef Fagbemi, includes representatives from the police, correctional services, human rights organizations, and religious bodies like the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs and the Christian Association of Nigeria. 

    Legal professionals such as Justice Augustine Utsaha and Prof. Nike Ijaiya are also part of the team.  

    The Secretary to the Government of the Federation, George Akume, explained that the initiative is based on the 1999 Constitution, which gives the President authority to grant clemency to federal offenders. 

    The committee, with a four-year tenure, will guide the President in this process to ensure justice and fairness.  

    Fagbemi noted that many applications for pardons have been submitted and promised a thorough evaluation.

     The committee will also visit correctional centers in different regions to identify cases deserving of clemency.

     After completing their work, they will present recommendations to the President for final decisions.