Category: Politics Lite

  • Tribunal ruling, a clear verdict on integrity of Nigeria’s electoral process- Akpabio

    Senate President, Godswill Akpabio has said that the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) delivered a clear verdict which resounds the integrity of Nigeria’s electoral process.

    Akpabio, in a statement on Thursday lauded the court judgment which affirmed the victory of President Bola Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima in the 2023 presidential election.

    He said the verdict is an affirmation of the popular mandate by Nigerians for Tinubu and Shettima at the February 25 presidential election.

    Akpabio congratulated Tinubu and Shettima on the resounding affirmation of their mandate.

    Akpabio said that the five-member panel painstakingly evaluated all the issues raised by the petitioners and and gave a clear ruling.

    He said it was clear for dispassionate observers that despite the challenges, Nigeria’s electoral process was making a steady progress and deserves the appreciation and support of all Nigerians and friends of Nigeria.

    Akpabio urged Nigerians to continue to support Tinubu’s government in its drive to deliver the renewed hope agenda of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

    “I also congratulate our great party, the All-Progressives Congress (APC), on its vindication by this well-thought-out landmark judgement.

    “This judgment has expressly affirmed the popular mandate of the Nigerian people for our party the APC and its Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidates, freely given at the February 2023 polls.

    “As the court has painstakingly addressed all the issues raised by the petitioners, I urge all concerned to accept the judgment and join hands with the Tinubu government in its bold efforts to secure the wellbeing of our people,” Akpabio said.

  • Tribunal Ruling: Atiku’s greed caused PDP defeat – VON DG

    The Director-General of the Voice of Nigeria (VON), Mr Osita Okechukwu, has said he fully understands the grief of the opposition parties over the judgement of the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC).
    Okechukwu, also a foundation member of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) said this when he spoke with journalists in Abuja.
    He said that although the main opposition PDP had bright chances of bouncing back through the 2023 presidential election, the political greed of the party’s candidate, former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, denied the party victory.
    Okechukwu said that Atiku’s failure to rise to the golden opportunity and play as a statesman by throwing support for his erstwhile running mate Peter Obi or any other Southern presidential candidate divided the opposition party.
    “Atiku dealt PDP a huge blow from which it might be difficult to recover.”
    He dismissed claims that the petitioners had maintained that President Bola Tinubu was not qualified to run and allegations of irregularities in the conduct of the election as well as the failure to electronically transmit results in real time were fatal to the respondents’ case.
    “Those intricate webs could have been resolved if Atiku had obeyed the zoning convention, supported Peter Obi or any other Southern presidential candidate it could been simply an all southern bout.
    “The Wike Masquerade couldn’t have emerged. That would have meant that the bulk of votes he garnered could have been credited to PDP.
    “Atiku divided PDP’s votes irreparably, all the votes Labour Party garnered were from the party’s stronghold, minus voted warehoused by the former Vice President who naively forgot that northern voters are one of the most sophisticated in the country, but believed that northern electorate would behave like children in a dormitory waiting for directives on how to vote,” he said.
    Okechukwu said that Tinubu deserved accolades for rescuing the zoning convention which guarantees equity, and natural justice between the north and south.
    “First and foremost, let me congratulate Tinubu, for rescuing the zoning convention, a ligament binding north and south from unprecedented assault.
    “To be honest, my take is that the opposition lost the election that day in 2022, when Atiku Abubakar trampled on the presidential zoning convention, which governed the 4th Republic Nigeria and was also embedded in his party’s Constitution.

    “Recall that Atiku earned accolades when he stormed out of PDP Convention in 2014 in protest that President Goodluck Jonathan was breaching the zoning convention. And, in 2018, Governor Nyesom Wike hosted PDP Convention in Port Harcourt and ensured that only northern presidential aspirants contested for the presidential ticket as a way of honouring the zoning convention.
    “So, it is obvious that when Atiku sacrificed statesmanship on the altar of narrow political ambition, one concluded that he had wittingly or unwittingly fatally wounded the fabric of PDP. And, going by the time worn cliché, a divided house cannot stand, Nigerians should recognise that Atiku by his greed denied PDP a possible victory.”
    On the way forward, the APC chieftain suggested the promulgation of a revised Electoral Act that will resolve all evident ambiguities, by enthroning mandatorily only electronic accreditation and transmission of results.
    “I subscribe to the idea that we should totally abolish manual collation of results and make electronic transmission of results mandatory. We also need to return to the popular Justice Uwais Handbook on Electoral Reform, which among other fine democratic tenets recommended how best to transparently recruit the INEC Chairman, Commissioners and sundry officials.

    “With these altercations, Election Petitions will definitely be concluded before swearing-in of winners. Let us not forget that our democracy has witnessed tremendous advancement and keep in mind the fact that democracy is not a revolution, but a work in progress,” Okechukwu said.

  • Tribunal dismisses PDP’s allegations, rejects Atiku’s 15 witnesses in case against Tinubu

    The Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal has made significant rulings in the case involving allegations against President Bola Tinubu by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its 2023 presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar.

    The court dismissed the allegations of forgery and conviction against Tinubu, emphasizing that the petitioners failed to specify the constitutional requirement that Tinubu purportedly did not meet in his bid for the presidency.

    Additionally, some paragraphs in the petition that accused Kogi State Governor and Friday Adejo, a Local Government Chairman in Kogi State, of electoral irregularities were struck out. The petitioners had not included them as parties in the case.

    Furthermore, the Tribunal rejected 15 out of the 27 witnesses presented by Atiku Abubakar, the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party.

    These witnesses were dismissed because they had failed to submit their statements on oath along with the petition. The Tribunal clarified that the petitioner had not filed these statements before the 21-day window closed, as required from the date of the election result announcement.

    These rulings highlight the meticulous examination of evidence and legal procedures by the Tribunal in the ongoing electoral dispute.

  • Tribunal: No mandatory provision for electronic result transmission in Electoral Act

    The Presidential Election Petitions Court has provided clarity on the use of electronic transmission of election results, asserting that the Electoral Act 2022 does not mandate it.

    In a ruling led by Justice Haruna Tsammani on Wednesday, the five-man panel emphasized that the only technological device required for Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) use is the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS).

    Regarding compliance with the Electoral Act and INEC Regulations and Guidelines, Justice Tsammani stated that there is no indication in the regulations that BVAS must electronically transmit polling unit results.

    Furthermore, the Tribunal clarified that the commission’s Results Viewing Portal (IReV) is not a collation system. This interpretation aligns with the judgment in the case of Oyetola vs INEC.

    Justice Tsammani highlighted, “There is no provision for the electronic transmission of election results in the Electoral Act 2022.” He underscored that any such transmission is, at best, optional.

  • Tribunal Ruling: Shettima, Gbajabiamila, Ribadu, govs, arrive court

    The Vice President of Nigeria,  Kashim Shettima, the National Security Adviser (NSA), Nuhu Ribadu, the chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC),  Abdulahi Ganduje and six state governors have stormed the presidential election petition court for the judgement on the petitions challenging the February 2023, Presidential Election.

    The governors are Bauchi state governor, Bala Mohammed, Nasarawa state governor, Abdulahi Sule, Yobe state governor, Mai Mala Buni, Ekiti state governor, Biodun Oyebanji  are among those that have arrived the PEPC.

    Others are Imo state governor, Hope Uzodima, his Kogi state counterpart, Yahaya Bello, Minister of state for Defense, Bello Matawale, the Labour Party chairman, Julius Abure, lawyers and supporters of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the Labour Party and the Allied Peoples Movement (APM). 

    The petition court sitting at the Court of Appeal in Abuja will be giving judgement in the three petitions challenging the emergency of Bola Tinubu as the winner if the election.

    Already, television stations had, the previous day, set  up their outside broadcast equipment in preparation for the live broadcast of the judgement.

    Recall that the Chief Registrar of the Court of Appeal, Umar Mohammed Bangari had, on Monday confirmed the judgement day and added that the judgement will be televised live by interested television stations for the public to follow to promote transparency and openness.

    Access to the court room was tough as security officials had to identify people with accreditation tag before accessing the court room.

    The Labour Party, PDP and their presidential candidates as well as the APM, in their petitions, are seeking the nullification of Tinubu’s election on the ground of substantial non compliance with the law.

    The five member panel of Justices will soon commence sitting.

    NIGERIAN ANCHOR had reported earlier this morning that there is heavy security presence at the appellate court. More details later…

  • Tight security measures in place as Presidential Tribunal readies for verdict

    Tight security measures in place as Presidential Tribunal readies for verdict

    The Court of Appeal Complex, situated in the Three Arms Zone along Shehu Shagari Way, Central Business District of Abuja, is currently under heightened security as the Presidential Election Petition Court prepares to deliver its judgment.

    Additionally, there has been an extensive security presence at the entry routes to the Federal Capital Territory’s satellite towns leading to the city centre.

    Armed soldiers and military personnel have set up checkpoints, causing some commuters to experience delays. This increased security presence persists despite the ongoing NLC warning strike, which is in its final day.

    The Tribunal is set to deliver its judgment on three cases challenging the outcome of the presidential election held on February 25.

    This decision comes approximately a month after the court heard the closing arguments from the parties involved in the petitions and only two weeks before the expiration of the statutory 180-day timeframe for hearing and determining cases filed in March.

    The five-member panel of the court, led by Haruna Tsammani, had reserved judgment on the petitions after concluding the closing arguments in early August.

    Multiple security operatives from various branches, including the armed forces, police, Department of State Service (DSS), and the Civil Defence, are currently stationed along all routes leading to the Court of Appeal Complex. Similar security formations are in place within the court complex itself.

    In a statement issued on Monday, the Chief Registrar of the Court, Mr. Umar Bangari, assured that all necessary measures have been taken to ensure the smooth and secure delivery of judgment in the three pending petitions. He explained that access to the courtroom will be restricted, allowing only invited members of political parties and the general public to enter to prevent congestion and security breaches.

    Furthermore, media outlets interested in broadcasting the judgment live will be permitted to do so at no cost to the court.

    As of 7.30 a.m., security personnel were conducting checks on lawyers and journalists entering the premises. Key government buildings, including the Federal Secretariat, the National Assembly Complex, and the access points to the Presidential Villa, were heavily guarded by security personnel.

    The three petitions challenging President Tinubu’s victory were filed separately by Atiku Abubakar of the PDP, Peter Obi of the Labour Party, and the Allied Peoples Movement (APM).

    President Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC) was declared the winner by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), receiving 8.8 million votes, defeating 17 other candidates in a largely competitive race.

    Atiku secured second place with 6,984,520 votes, followed by Obi with a total of 6,101,533 votes, according to INEC’s official results.

  • No court sacked Gov Oborevwori -Delta Govt 

    No court sacked Gov Oborevwori -Delta Govt 

    Delta State Government, Thursday, said the Appeal Court sitting in Abuja did not overturn the election of Governor Sheriff Oborevwori as speculated by the governorship candidate of the Labour Party, Mr Ken Pela and his supporters.

    This is following a rumour making the rounds that the Appeal Court had declared Mr Ken Pela as Governor of the state.

    Reacting to the rumor, the Chief Press Secretary to the Governor, Sir Festus Ahon, in Asaba, said the Appeal Court only ordered that the tribunal to hear the case. 

    Ahon in the statement said: “We have been inundated by reports from a section of the media that the Appeal Court had declared Mr Ken Pela of the Labour Party as winner of the 2023 Governorship election in Delta State. 

    “The report is nothing but fake news as the Appellate Court only ordered the tribunal to hear the case. 

    “From the results declared by the electoral umpire, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), it was obvious that the Labour Party did not win the election therefore couldn’t have won in court. 

    “Our people came out in large numbers to elect Governor Sheriff Oborevwori and they are happy with him. We therefore urge Party faithfuls and Deltans to disregard the said reports as it was a concoction from the Labour Party and their followers. 

    “We also urge Deltans to remain calm. As at the time of the fake news, Governor Oborevwori was busy inspecting various ongoing projects within Asaba and its environs. He is focused on delivering dividends of democracy to the people of the state and would not be distracted by the rumour mills.

    “Our lawyers are studying the Appeal Court judgment with a view to taking necessary action,” he said.

  • NNPP makes U-turn, denies suspending Kwankwaso

    The National Working Committee (NWC) of the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) has refuted the purported suspension of Sen. Rabiu Kwankwaso, the 2023 Presidential Candidate from the party.
    Mr Ladipo Johnson, the NNPP National Auditor, stated this at a news conference on Wednesday the party’s National Headquarters in Abuja.
    Johnson, a former spokesperson for Kwankwanso Presidential Campaign Council, said that the suspension was null and void.
    A faction of the party headed by a former Board of Trustees (BoT) Chairman, Mr Boniface Aniebonan had on Tuesday suspended Kwankwaso for six months over alleged anti-party activities, after a parallel National Executive Committee (NEC) in Lagos.
    It also appointed the former National Publicity Secretary of the party, Mr Major Agbo as the acting National Chairman.
    But, Johnson said that Aniebonam and Agbo were on August 24 suspended for three months for engaging in unwholesome acts before they were later expelled from the party.
    He added that the party NEC, at its meeting on Tuesday in Abuja which was monitored by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), took certain decisions including the election of new national officials, change of the party logo and expulsion of Aniebonam and Agbo.
    “Is it not funny that all those people either suspended or expelled would gather somewhere and claim to have suspended Kwankwaso and also dissolve the NWC?

    “The jokers also appointed a CTC made up of those people who have ceased to be members of the party by virtue of our constitution.

    “Was INEC at the meeting? Did they write INEC? Who and who signed the letter?

    “Is it not laughable that Major Agbo, who announced the suspension of the former chairmen, the expulsion of two of them, and the dissolution of some of the states is now purportedly “heading” their caretaker committee,” Johnson said.

    He said it was unfortunate that some people had reduced politics and party administration to huge jokes.

    “The news that one person will sit somewhere and arrogate certain powers to himself is not permissible in a democracy.

    “We are using this medium to assure our supporters all over the country that there is no substance in the story.

    “Kwankwaso remains the face of the party, has not been suspended, and the NWC under Ali remains intact,’’ he said.
    Johnson however, admitted that Kwankwaso was invited to meetings by President Bola Tinubu on some issues saying that the meetings were far from being anti-party activities.

    He said that while Kwankwaso always took permission before attending such meetings, no conclusion had so far been reached from the meetings.

    He also denied the allegation that Kwankwaso hijacked the party from members who were in the party before he joined with his movement in February 2022.

    Johnson, however, said that the party leadership would do its best for possible reconciliation.

    Also speaking, Mr Oluwatosin Odeyemi, the Chairman, forum of NNPP state chairmen, said the purported suspension of Kwankwaso was politics of bitterness.

    “Let me remind you that the present secretary of that group was expelled from this party and Agbo was the one who read it out that he had been expelled. Agbo attended all the meetings of that committee.

    “So, you can see that it’s politics of bitterness. Something you read is something you agreed with. It was not as if you were pressure to read a release as the national publicity secretary.

    “So now an expelled person that you confirm his explosion is whom you are now regarding so as yours, secretary,’’ Odeyemi said.

  • LP primary appeal dismissed for lack of locus standi

    The Court of Appeal situated in Abuja has ruled to dismiss the appeal lodged by Sir Basil Maduka, the Labour Party’s candidate for the Imo governorship election. The dismissal was based on the grounds of lack of locus standi.

    Justice Olubunmi Oyewole, in his judgment, determined that Maduka did not possess the legal right to challenge the primary election, given that he was not an aspirant in the said election.

    Consequently, the court not only rejected the appeal but also levied a cost of N250,000 against the appellant.

    Maduka had emerged as the candidate of the Labour Party within the Julius Abure-led faction, whereas the Lamidi Apapa faction’s candidate was recognized by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    Following the high court’s dismissal of his suit challenging INEC’s decision, Maduka pursued his case at the court of appeal. However, the 1st and 3rd respondents, namely the Labour Party and Ikechukwu Joseph, contested his action by filing processes that disputed the appellant’s contentions.

    They pointed out that the primary election of the 1st respondent occurred on April 16, 2023, as rescheduled by the national leadership of the party. Additionally, they emphasized that the appellant was not a participant in this primary election, which was won by the 3rd respondent.

    Justice Oyewole, while considering the arguments from both sides’ legal representatives, underlined the concept of locus standi as a prerequisite for maintaining an action in court. He stressed that the absence of such standing undermines the court’s jurisdiction to adjudicate on the matter.

    The judge further explained that the appellant failed to establish his participation in the primary election organized by the 1st respondent, rendering him unable to contest the election’s outcome. Consequently, he upheld the lower court’s decision that the appellant lacked the necessary locus standi to maintain the action.

    In conclusion, the appeal was deemed meritless and dismissed. A cost of N250,000 was ordered to be paid to the 1st and 3rd respondents by the appellant.

  • Kogi Guber: Appeal Court dismisses suits seeking Ododo’s disqualification 

    The Court of Appeal, Abuja on Friday dismissed the appeals filed by a former Senator representing Kogi West Senatorial District at the National Assembly, Smart Adeyemi and that of a governorship aspirant of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Kogi state, Mr. Abubakar Achimugu, seeking to nullify the governorship primary election of the party which produced Ahmed Usman Ododo as the party’s flagbearer for the Kogi state governorship election slated for November 11.

    The court held in a unanimous judgement that the two appeals challenging the judgement of the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja lacked merit and accordingly dismissed them.

    Justice Muhammed Lawal Shuaibu’s led panel held that the appellants failed to prove the criminal allegations in his case.

    The Appellate court ruled that the burden of prove lies on the plaintiff who alleges irregularities in the conduct of the primary election of the APC for the nomination of its governorship candidate in the forthcoming governorship election in Kogi state.

    He said, “the evidence placed before the trial court by the respondents was not controverted by the appellant in this circumstance, issue one is hereby resolved against the appellant.

    “Where commission of a crime is an issue, it must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. Allegation of falsification of votes is a criminal act and it is required in law to be proved beyond reasonable doubt, which the appellant could not prove, consequently, issue two is resolved against the appellant.

    “On the whole, the appeal is un-meritorious and it is hereby dismissed. The judgement of the lower court is hereby affirmed. Parties are to bear their respective cost”, Justice Shuaibu held.

    Recall that Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja had, in a judgement delivered on July 12, held that Adeyemi did not prove his allegation that Ododo was not lawfully nominated by the APC. 

    Adeyemi had alleged in his suit that the primary election that purportedly produced Ododo as the APC governorship candidate did not hold and that the results were forged.

    Delivering judgement in the suit marked FHC/CS/556/2023, Justice Omotosho held that Adeyemi’s allegations of results forgery were criminal and must be proved beyond reasonable doubts.

    The court noted that the burden of proof was on the applicant to produce the forged results or the original copies of the results to discharge the burden and added that, failure to discharge the burden was fatal to the applicant’s case and further held that, there was evidence that the primary election was validly held and monitored by INEC.

    Dissatisfied with the judgement which affirmed the primary election that produced Ododo as candidate of the party, Adeyemi approached the appellate court to set aside the judgement.

    Adeyemi had in his suit at the trial court, sought the cancellation of the primary election on the ground that it was not validly conducted and prayed the court to declare as illegal, unlawful and invalid, the purported direct primary election said to have been conducted by the APC, through which Ododo emerged as a candidate for the governorship poll.

    The former lawmaker told the court that Ododo was handpicked as flag-bearer of the party by the outgoing Governor of the state, Yahaya Bello, in gross violation of Section 177 of the 1999 Constitution, Section 29 and 84 of the Electoral Act as well as Article 20 of the Constitution of the APC.

    Besides, the aggrieved governorship aspirant, through his team of lawyers led by Dr Adekunle Ottitoju, prayed the court to order the APC to conduct a fresh primary election and to give all aspirants equal opportunity as prescribed by the Electoral Act, 2022.

    But, in his judgement, Justice Omotosho held that the plaintiff did not by way of credible evidence, establish his allegation and said, he found no reason to invalidate the outcome of the primary election and consequently dismissed the suit for lacking in merit. 

    In the same vein, the Court of Appeal, Abuja dismissed Achimugu’s appeal against a judgement of a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja which affirmed Ahmed Usman Ododo as the APC flagbearer for the November 11, 2023 governorship election in Kogi state.

    The appeal was against the judgement of Justice Obiora Egwuatu delivered on 18th July which held that, Ododo can lawfully continue to fly the flag of the APC in the November 11, 2023 governorship election in Kogi State.

    The appellate court, in a unanimous judgement delivered on Friday held that Achimugu’s appeal is bereft of merit and affirmed the judgement of the trial court.

    The court consequently dismissed the appeal for lacking in merit.

    Achimugu had approached the trial court with a suit seeking to disqualify Ododo from contesting the November 11 governorship election on grounds that he did not resign his employment with the Kogi State public service 30 days before contesting the governorship primary election.

    But, the trial court, in its judgment, held that contrary to the claim of Achimugu, evidence showed that Ododo resigned his appointment more than 30 days before participating in the APC primary.

    According to Justice Egwuatu, exhibits tendered by the defendants showed that while Ododo’s resignation letter was received by the Office of the Kogi State Governor on March 8, that of the 3rd defendant, Mr Salami Deedat, was received on March 9.

    “Satisfied that they resigned their appointment on March 8 and 9, more than 30 days before the April 14 primary election of the APC, the suit is bereft of any merit and is accordingly dismissed”, the court held.

    Achimugu, in a Notice of Appeal filed on July 21 through his counsel, Josiah Daniel-Ebune said Justice Egwuatu erred in law and occasioned a miscarriage of justice when he held that Ododo and Salami Deedat (2nd and 3rd defendants) duly resigned their appointment and thus, not caught up with the mandatory provision of what the law requires them to do before they participated in the APC’s governorship primary election for Kogi state held on April 15, 2023.

    He asked the appellate court for an order setting aside the judgement of the trial court and grant all his reliefs sought in his amended originating summons.